Laura’s parenting style is ‘hands-off’ due to her strict, religious upbringing

Being raised under strict religious doctrine can have knock-on effects that impact all parts of life, particularly parenting, says Dr Cathy Kezelman, president of Blue Knot Foundation, an organisation that provides information and support to those suffering complex trauma. “When you’ve been raised within a controlled environment with very little freedom to make your own choices or realise that you can make choices,” she says, “it’s very difficult to develop the strong core sense of self necessary to provide your children with a secure base from which they can explore the world.”

According to Kezelman, healing begins by making sense of what has happened, how it affected you, learning self-compassion and re-evaluating your upbringing through parenting your own children. “Ways to achieve this can include counselling, self-care, meditation, yoga and art therapy. All can help to soothe the nervous system, build a sense of safety and trust and, as a parent, gradually enable your children to develop a sense of security and autonomy.”

Here, three women who have left their religion share their experiences.

“Parenting has been a healing experience”
Laura McConnell Conti, 43, was a fifth-generation member of a strict fundamentalist Christian sect. Because she suffers from complex post-traumatic stress disorder, the responsibility of parenting falls on her child’s father.

“From age 12, I helped to raise my siblings. I was the eldest girl and that was what was expected of me because of our religious community’s gendered beliefs. Daily, I had to prepare their clothes, get them ready for school, help them with their homework. On the weekends I had to ensure they attended church events wearing the right dresses and having their hair in the right style. Overall, I had to keep their behaviour in line with our religious beliefs and this left me exhausted.

Wanting something different for my life, I left the church at 19. Once I got an education and a well-paying job, I was able to afford therapy. Subsequently, I spent my late 20s and 30s recovering from complex trauma – a consequence of having to worry about and care for others when I was a child myself.

At first, I didn’t want to have children. I didn’t feel I was maternal like other women seem to be, or that I had the capacity to raise a child without it impacting my health.

Eventually, I met with someone who understood that the only way I could have a child was if he was the primary carer, and I had a son in my late 30s.

I didn’t think my life would change very much, but the reality is that parenting has been a healing experience for my own childhood trauma – although that was not the intention or the expectation.

My parenting style is hands-off. I don’t have the capacity to worry or organise for my son. Difficult things, like going to the doctor or getting vaccinations, I leave to his father. I get to do more of the fun stuff – clothes shopping, hanging out and playing.

When you leave a high-control group, you don’t have a template from which to mirror good parenting. You’re relearning to do things in a very different way and, as a result, I find parenting to be a lonely experience.

And due to the abuses I experienced, I’m hyper-vigilant. This means my son hears and learns about personal safety and consent at a much younger age than most. In turn, during periods when I’m not feeling well, he understands that I can’t be completely present in his life.

I aim to raise a well-rounded human being, who can identify safe people, has the ability to be confident in life and is surrounded by good friends, so he won’t need to fill his voids from such groups.”

“The backlash from the parish was shocking”
Mel Welch, 41, was born and raised under strict religious doctrine. When she left the church, she was overprotective of her children. She has since learnt that instilling self-trust is the best way to empower them.

“There were lots of rules and heavy control under the religious group I was raised in. The biggest fear instilled in me was of going to hell. It was deeply ingrained that if I upset anyone or did anything wrong, that would upset God and I would be banished to hell automatically. So I made sure not to upset the pastors or my parents.

I married a pastor’s son when I was 18 and he was 20. Marriage was the only way that being alone together would be allowed by the pastors.

Sadly, my first-born child died at birth. The backlash from the members of the parish was shocking: some said my baby’s death was because we didn’t pray enough. We were consequently given six weeks to get over our grief.

I went on to have four more children and by the time I turned 30, I could no longer keep up with the pressure I was putting on myself to attend weekly church gatherings and Sunday service. Feeling that no matter what I did I would never be enough, one Sunday afternoon in 2012 I sat opposite my husband and said, ‘I’m no longer attending church.’ My body felt nauseous from the anxiety of even hearing me say that and my husband turned white. That goes to show just how much power they had over our lives.

Consequently, I was shunned by the community. Gradually, my husband came to his own realisation and conclusion about the church and followed me six months later.

During this time, I continued to read the Bible on my own. The more I did, the more I started to listen to and trust my intuition about what the teachings meant. This is a new God, I realised. I slowly understood that I wasn’t going to die because I’d left the church. It was all a lie, so I started to wonder what else wasn’t true.

There was definitely a long transition period around figuring out how to raise my kids, because I was relearning so much and essentially becoming an adult myself. Until I was able to discern the lies from the truths, I became overprotective of them, a form of helicopter parenting, especially around any sort of religious ideas or strict ideals.

Over time, I realised that self-trust is necessary to thrive. I’ve taught my children to create a personal relationship with God through reading the Bible on their own, a relationship that’s based on self-awareness and confidence in their own instincts.”

“Marrying outside the church was frowned upon”
Susannah Birch, 37, was raised in a church that discouraged her from engaging in “worldly” activities. She is teaching her children how to be independent thinkers.

“One of the main teachings I was raised on is that Christians shouldn’t be ‘worldly’. This meant I wasn’t allowed to read mainstream books – by the time I was 12, I had actually read the Bible twice – watch popular movies or wear ostentatious jewellery or make-up. Sex before marriage was considered a sin. Further, being friends with or marrying anyone from outside the church group was severely frowned upon because they were considered to be ‘evil’.

My parents divorced when I was 13, by which time my family had distanced itself from the church. To my surprise, my father, who maintained more balanced religious beliefs, allowed me to do things considered worldly. I quickly discovered the Spice Girls and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and that began to change my whole world view. I also read different book genres and that made me question everything I had been taught growing up.

Subsequently, at age 20, I married a non-Christian. And when I had my two children, I intentionally introduced them early on to a wide range of fiction, music and movies so they could have a holistic view of the world.

Prior to becoming a parent, I thought I was over my indoctrination. Yet whenever my children did things the church would consider wrong or ‘sinful’, I was back in that world. I had to take conscious steps to prevent myself from imposing narrow ideas on my children. Today, whenever my children do something wrong, I try to explain to them why it’s wrong, as opposed to the punishments I received growing up, which I was never allowed to question.

My children attend a Catholic school, which I chose due to the quality of education it offers. It doesn’t bother me that they may be exposed to religious teachings, because at home we read and talk about multiple religions and philosophies, including paganism and Buddhism.

I’ve done my best to teach them to see different points of view and choose what they want to follow, after applying critical thinking. If they feel that something is true simply from emotions or peer pressure, I try to encourage them to question why and to think for themselves, not to be swayed by others’ opinions. I also want them to question the world around them and not to sit in self-criticism, as the church I grew up in taught me to do.”

蓝结基金会(Blue Knot Foundation)是一个为遭受复杂创伤的人提供信息和支持的组织,该基金会主席凯茜-凯泽尔曼(Cathy Kezelman)博士说,在严格的宗教教义下长大会产生连锁反应,影响生活的方方面面,尤其是养育子女。”她说:”当你在一个受控制的环境中长大,几乎没有自由做出自己的选择或意识到自己可以做出选择时,你就很难培养出必要的强烈的核心自我意识,从而为你的孩子提供一个可以探索世界的安全基础。

凯泽尔曼认为,治疗首先要了解发生了什么,它是如何影响你的,学会自我同情,并通过养育自己的孩子来重新评估你的成长经历。”实现这一目标的方法包括咨询、自我保健、冥想、瑜伽和艺术疗法。所有这些都可以帮助舒缓神经系统,建立安全感和信任感,作为父母,逐渐让孩子建立安全感和自主感。”

在这里,三位已经脱离宗教的女性分享了她们的经验。

“为人父母是一次治愈的经历
43 岁的劳拉-麦康奈尔-孔蒂是一个严格的原教旨主义基督教派的第五代成员。由于她患有复杂的创伤后应激障碍,养育孩子的责任就落在了孩子的父亲身上。

“从 12 岁开始,我就帮助抚养我的兄弟姐妹。我是长女,这也是我们宗教团体的性别信仰对我的期望。每天,我都要为他们准备衣服,让他们做好上学的准备,帮他们做作业。周末,我必须确保她们穿着合适的衣服、梳着合适的发型参加教会活动。总之,我必须让他们的行为符合我们的宗教信仰,这让我疲惫不堪。

为了追求不同的生活,我在 19 岁时离开了教会。当我接受教育并找到一份收入不错的工作后,我就有能力支付治疗费用了。随后,我在 20 多岁和 30 多岁时从复杂的心理创伤中恢复过来–这是我自己还是个孩子时不得不担心和照顾他人的后果。

起初,我并不想生孩子。我觉得自己不像其他女性那样具有母性,也不认为自己有能力抚养孩子而不影响自己的健康。

最后,我遇到了一个人,他理解我只有在他是主要照顾者的情况下才能要孩子,于是我在 30 多岁时有了一个儿子。

我本以为我的生活不会有太大的改变,但现实是,养育孩子治愈了我童年的创伤–尽管这并不是我的初衷或期望。

我的育儿方式是放手不管。我没有能力为儿子操心或安排事情。困难的事情,比如看医生或接种疫苗,我都交给他父亲去做。我可以做更多有趣的事情–买衣服、闲逛和玩耍。

当你离开一个高度控制的群体时,你就没有了一个可以借鉴的良好育儿模板。你要重新学习以一种截然不同的方式做事,因此,我觉得养育孩子是一种孤独的体验。

由于经历过虐待,我变得高度警惕。这意味着我的儿子在比大多数人更小的时候就听说并学会了个人安全和同意。反过来,在我不舒服的时候,他也明白我不可能完全参与他的生活。

我的目标是培养一个全面发展的人,他能识别安全的人,有能力对生活充满信心,身边有很多好朋友,这样他就不需要从这类群体中填补空缺了。”

“教区的反弹令人震惊”
41 岁的梅尔-韦尔奇是在严格的宗教教义下出生和长大的。离开教会后,她对孩子过度保护。从那时起,她明白了灌输自我信任是增强孩子能力的最好方法。

“在我成长的宗教团体中,有很多规则和严格的控制。灌输给我的最大恐惧就是下地狱。根深蒂固的观念是,如果我惹恼了任何人或做错了任何事,就会惹恼上帝,我就会被自动放逐到地狱。因此,我确保不惹牧师和父母生气。

我 18 岁时嫁给了一位牧师的儿子,当时他 20 岁。只有结婚,牧师们才会允许我们单独在一起。

不幸的是,我的第一个孩子在出生时就夭折了。教区成员的反弹令人震惊:有些人说我孩子的死是因为我们祈祷不够。因此,我们被给予六周的时间来走出悲痛。

我后来又生了四个孩子,到我 30 岁时,我再也无法承受每周参加教会聚会和主日礼拜给自己带来的压力。2012年的一个周日下午,我坐在丈夫对面说:”我不再去教堂了。听到我这么说,我的身体感到一阵恶心,而我的丈夫脸色煞白。这足以说明他们对我们的生活有多大的影响力。

因此,我受到了社区的排斥。渐渐地,我丈夫对教会有了自己的认识和结论,并在六个月后追随了我。

在此期间,我继续自己读圣经。读得越多,我就越开始倾听并相信自己对教义含义的直觉。我意识到,这是一个全新的上帝。我慢慢明白,我不会因为离开教会而死。这一切都是谎言,所以我开始思考还有什么不是真的。

在如何抚养孩子的问题上,我肯定经历了一段漫长的过渡期,因为我重新学习了很多东西,基本上自己也变成了一个成年人。在我能够辨别谎言和真相之前,我变得过度保护他们,这是一种 “直升机养育”,尤其是在任何宗教观念或严格的理想方面。

随着时间的推移,我意识到自我信任是茁壮成长的必要条件。我教孩子们通过自己阅读《圣经》与上帝建立个人关系,这种关系建立在自我意识和对自己直觉的自信之上。

“在教会外结婚是不被允许的”
37 岁的苏珊娜-伯奇(Susannah Birch)从小生活在一个不鼓励她参与 “世俗 “活动的教会。她正在教孩子们如何成为独立的思考者。

“我从小接受的主要教导之一就是基督徒不应该’世俗’。这意味着我不能阅读主流书籍(12 岁时,我实际上已经读了两遍《圣经》),不能看流行电影,也不能佩戴浮夸的首饰或化妆。婚前性行为被认为是一种罪过。此外,与教会以外的人做朋友或结婚都会受到严厉的指责,因为他们被认为是 “邪恶 “的。

我的父母在我 13 岁时离婚了,那时我的家庭已经远离了教会。令我惊讶的是,我的父亲在宗教信仰上比较平衡,他允许我做一些被认为是世俗的事情。我很快就发现了辣妹和吸血鬼猎人巴菲,这开始改变了我的整个世界观。我还阅读了不同类型的书籍,这让我对从小到大所受的一切教育产生了质疑。

随后,20 岁那年,我嫁给了一个非基督徒。有了两个孩子后,我有意让他们尽早接触各种小说、音乐和电影,让他们对世界有一个全面的认识。

在为人父母之前,我以为自己已经摆脱了被灌输的观念。然而,每当我的孩子们做了教会认为错误或 “有罪 “的事情时,我就又回到了那个世界。我不得不有意识地采取措施,防止自己把狭隘的想法强加给孩子。如今,每当我的孩子做错事时,我都会试着向他们解释为什么这样做是错的,而不是像我在成长过程中受到的惩罚那样,从不允许我提出质疑。

我的孩子们就读于一所天主教学校,我选择这所学校是因为它的教育质量。我并不担心他们会接触到宗教教义,因为在家里我们会阅读和谈论多种宗教和哲学,包括异教和佛教。

我尽我所能教他们看到不同的观点,并在运用批判性思维后选择他们想要遵循的观点。如果他们仅仅因为情绪或同伴的压力而认为某件事情是正确的,我会尽量鼓励他们质疑原因并自己思考,而不是被他人的观点所左右。我还希望他们质疑周围的世界,而不是像我成长的教会教导我的那样,坐在自我批判中”。

https://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/laura-s-parenting-style-is-hands-off-due-to-her-strict-religious-upbringing-20231101-p5egp2.html

While researching cults, I began to wonder if I’d been raised in one

It’s so easy to be judgy about people who get caught up in a cult, right? Even if you don’t want to be. I mean, it wouldn’t happen to us. We’d see right through all that weird stuff – like the specific language that means nothing to outsiders, knowing that only believers are on the right path, the rules which make no sense, and the charismatic leader who is clearly a bit off.

That’s what I thought when I started digging around, researching my latest novel that looks behind the walls of The Sanctuary, an imagined closed religious community dedicated to clean, organic living and environmentalism.

While there may be no single definition of a cult, they share a few potent ingredients, such as general isolation from the rest of society, an unquestioning adherence to a set of beliefs, a strict authoritarian hierarchy of power and a rock-hard sense of being among the chosen ones.Hmmm. I recognised quite a few of those ingredients. I hadn’t joined a cult. But maybe I’d been born into one.I grew up in a large Catholic family on an isolated farm outside Melbourne. I went to a Catholic school, we went to Mass on Sunday, we socialised with other Catholics. We basically didn’t mix with anybody else. We did know one or two non-Catholics and they were nice but they weren’t going to heaven. Not like us.We held a comprehensive set of beliefs that, without a normalising lens, are hard to get your head around. Such as Mary’s virgin birth, eating Christ’s body and drinking his blood, going to hell if you missed Mass on Sunday. We even had a shared language that defined us, such as transubstantiation (bread and wine in the Eucharist becomes Christ’s real body and blood) and the Blessed Trinity (three Gods in one, but really it’s just one God).

We held a comprehensive set of beliefs that, without a normalising lens, are hard to get your head around. Such as Mary’s virgin birth.

Then there were the rules about when you ate and what you ate, such as no eating before Mass, and no meat on Fridays, which I loved because we got to have fish and chips once a week – religiously. You had to regularly confess your sins, which led to considerable pre-reconciliation whispering as us kids figured out which sin we could make up this week.

And most damagingly, there was the unquestioned power of the god-like parish priest. And we all know now what that resulted in. In fact, the 2017 Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse inquiry identified my parish and the local boy’s secondary college as one of the active centres of paedophilia.

I didn’t question any of these rules and beliefs.

The contest of ideas I discovered at university knocked our brand of Catholicism out of me. Yet, still, years later when I had my own family, the kids eventually did some of the sacraments so they wouldn’t feel too out of place at family church events.

When my youngest child was preparing for their First Reconciliation, we dutifully read the children’s Bible stories from the Old Testament every night as requested. Now this child, who had previously declared that they wanted to be an “evil overlord” when they grew up said to me one night, “Oh mama, I’m getting a lot of good ideas about how to be an evil overlord from God.”

I laughed out loud. I hadn’t seen it before. I had completely normalised that God could legitimately require Abraham to prove his undying devotion by killing his son. Or that it was perfectly acceptable that God would test Job’s excellent piety by taking away his possessions, his family and then his health. Yeah, now that I think about it, my child was spot on: you could say that the God of the Old Testament did abuse his power as leader.

Obviously, it was a unique set of conditions that meant I experienced cult-like conditions as a child. Very few people can now live in that kind of isolation. We have the internet, which beams in all sorts of ideas all the time. As well, the modern Catholic Church has shared leadership between priests and parishioners, so authority no longer rests in a single godlike being.

There are thousands of cults across the world, from self-help cults, to political and religious cults. Many of them don’t look anything like the doomsday cult, Heaven’s Gate, which ended in mass suicide, as members tried to catch a passing comet in 1997. Or Australia’s own Ideal Human Environment, which began in the ’80s as an experiment in happiness, harmony and ideal living. In 2019, leader James Salerno was imprisoned for unlawful sexual intercourse with a child, and the truth about the abuse behind those closed doors was exposed. The IHE had been operating for 30 years.

None of us joins a cult – we join a movement to make ourselves and the world a better place. But my experience taught me that it’s a fine line between intentional community and cult. That line is defined by how power is exercised.

So, whether you’re seeking your own happiness, or a new way of making the world a better place, like that great meditation group you just joined or that conspiracy idea that is sweeping around you, take care. Watch what happens when you ask questions. If they close you down, or make you feel guilty for asking in the first place, I’m guessing it is a good idea to keep asking those questions.

人们很容易对陷入邪教的人评头论足,对吗?即使你并不想这样。我是说,这种事不会发生在我们身上。我们会一眼看穿那些怪异的东西–比如对外人毫无意义的特定语言,知道只有信徒才走在正确的道路上,那些毫无意义的规则,以及那个魅力十足但明显有点不正常的领袖。

当我开始四处挖掘、研究我的最新小说时,我就是这么想的。这部小说描写了 “圣所 “高墙背后的故事。”圣所 “是一个想象中的封闭的宗教社区,致力于清洁、有机的生活和环保。

虽然对邪教可能没有一个统一的定义,但它们都有一些共同的要素,比如与社会其他部分的普遍隔离、对一套信仰的不容置疑的坚持、严格的专制权力等级制度以及坚如磐石的 “被选中者 “意识。

嗯。我认出了其中的一些成分。我没有加入邪教。但也许我生来就是一个。

我在一个天主教大家庭里长大,家在墨尔本郊外一个与世隔绝的农场。我上的是天主教学校,我们周日去做弥撒,和其他天主教徒交往。我们基本上不和其他人来往。我们确实认识一两个非天主教徒,他们人很好,但他们不会上天堂。和我们不一样。

我们有一套完整的信仰,如果没有一个正常化的视角,你很难理解这些信仰。比如马利亚的处女之身,吃基督的身体喝他的血,错过周日的弥撒就会下地狱。我们甚至有共同的语言来定义我们自己,比如 “变体”(圣餐中的面包和酒变成了基督真正的身体和血液)和 “三位一体”(三位神合一,但实际上只有一位神)。

我们持有一整套信仰,如果没有一个正常化的视角,你很难理解这些信仰。比如马利亚的处女之身。

还有关于何时吃饭和吃什么的规定,比如弥撒前不能吃东西,周五不能吃肉,我很喜欢这些规定,因为我们每周都能虔诚地吃一次炸鱼和薯条。你必须定期忏悔自己的罪过,这导致我们这些孩子在忏悔前窃窃私语,盘算着这周可以弥补哪些罪过。

最可怕的是,教区牧师拥有不容置疑的神力。我们现在都知道这造成了什么后果。事实上,2017 年皇家儿童性虐待机构对策委员会的调查将我所在的教区和当地的男子中学列为恋童癖的活跃中心之一。

我没有质疑过这些规则和信仰。

我在大学里发现的思想较量将我们的天主教打得体无完肤。然而,多年后,当我有了自己的家庭后,孩子们最终还是参加了一些圣礼,这样他们在家庭教会活动中就不会感到太格格不入了。

在我最小的孩子准备第一次修和的时候,我们每天晚上都会按照要求读《旧约全书》中的儿童圣经故事。有一天晚上,这个之前宣称长大后要当 “邪恶霸主 “的孩子对我说:”哦,妈妈,我从上帝那里得到了很多关于如何成为邪恶霸主的好主意。

我笑出了声。我以前从未见过这种情况。上帝可以合法地要求亚伯拉罕通过杀死他的儿子来证明他的不朽献身精神,这一点我已经完全习以为常了。或者说,上帝完全可以通过夺走约伯的财产、家人和健康来考验他的虔诚。是的,现在想想,我的孩子说得很对:可以说,《旧约》中的上帝确实滥用了他作为领袖的权力。

很显然,我小时候经历过类似邪教的环境,这是一系列独特的条件。现在很少有人能生活在那种与世隔绝的环境中了。我们有互联网,无时无刻不在传播各种思想。此外,现代天主教会的牧师和教友共享领导权,因此权威不再掌握在一个神一样的存在手中。

全世界有成千上万的邪教,从自助邪教到政治和宗教邪教。其中很多都不像末日邪教 “天堂之门 “那样,1997 年,该组织成员试图抓住一颗飞过的彗星,最终以集体自杀告终。还有澳大利亚的 “理想人类环境”(Ideal Human Environment),该组织始于上世纪 80 年代,是一项关于幸福、和谐和理想生活的实验。2019 年,领导人詹姆斯-萨勒诺(James Salerno)因与儿童非法性交而入狱,闭门造车背后的虐待真相也随之曝光。IHE 已经运作了 30 年。

我们没有人加入邪教–我们加入的是一场让自己和世界变得更美好的运动。但我的经历告诉我,意向性社区和邪教之间的界限很微妙。这条界限是由如何行使权力决定的。

因此,无论你是在寻求自己的幸福,还是在寻求一种让世界变得更美好的新方式,比如你刚刚加入的那个很棒的冥想小组,或是那个在你身边风靡一时的阴谋理念,都要小心谨慎。注意你提问时会发生什么。如果他们把你拒之门外,或者让你因为一开始就提出问题而感到内疚,我猜继续提出这些问题是个好主意。

https://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/while-researching-cults-i-began-to-wonder-if-i-d-been-raised-in-one-20240313-p5fc6s.html?fbclid=IwAR3wBVuMy9QW22ehK65XwIamWbQaX3UyuPoELjKAFVxoDNb8zC7FDS3Pb24_aem_AQLItUqfslq4B6Vr88ztWJ_gnqNieJLQOfBl6Qqwb-XdWMYyKYHCAWHpLTJChASL0cTVXj-T_m_0anFBu0XLiLYX

What it really means when you dream about cheating on your loved ones, according to a brain surgeon

As a neurosurgeon and a research scientist, dreams hold a particular fascination for me. Having spent my life immersed in the brain, I am not only infatuated with its infinite complexity but also captivated to the point of obsession by what remains one of its greatest and most mysterious features: dreaming. The source of dreams is the same as all mental activity — waves of electricity moving across the brain every moment we’re alive.

Dreams are a product of normal brain function, and an extraordinary transformation that occurs in the brain each night when we sleep, following the circadian rhythms — the day-night cycles — that biologically govern life. Each night, our brains and bodies follow a repeating 90-minute cycle of light sleep followed by deep sleep, where the brainwaves are slow and rhythmic. The eyes start rolling under their lids and most of the muscles in the body become paralysed.

When the eyes are fluttering under the eyelids, this is known as rapid eye movement or REM sleep. REM sleep and dreaming are often described as synonymous, but this is inaccurate. We can dream in all stages of sleep. But REM sleep is when the most intense and bizarre dreams occur. Dreams change as the night progresses.

Early-night dreams tend to include more elements from our waking life. Dreams at the end of the night are more likely to be emotional and incorporate older autobiographical memories, and it’s these dreams, which we have just before we wake up, that we’re most likely to remember. The tenor of our dreams shifts, too. Dreams are more negative at the beginning of the night and become more positive as the night goes on.

Dreams affect us deeply because we experience them as real. The joy we feel in dreams is physiologically no different from the joy felt when we are awake; neither is the terror, frustration, sexual excitement, anger and fear. Run in our dreams and the motor cortex is activated — the same part of your brain that you’d use if you were actually running. Feel a lover’s touch in your dream, and the sensory cortex is stimulated, just as it would be in your waking hours.

If we’re sleep deprived, the first thing we catch up on is dreaming. If we’ve had enough sleep but are dream deprived, we will immediately start dreaming as soon as we fall asleep. These days, there is much focus on needing sleep to be healthy, but it may be that it’s not the sleep we really need, but the dreams.

Erotic dreams are part of human nature. You couldn’t stop them even if you wanted to. Menopause does not extinguish them, nor does chemical castration. It doesn’t matter whether you are sexually active, celibate, married or single. Erotic dreams are universal. In surveys, sexual dreams were reported by 90 per cent of Brits, 87 per cent of Germans, 77 per cent of Canadians, 70 per cent of Chinese, 68 per cent of Japanese, and 66 per cent of Americans.

An estimated one in 12 of all dreams contains sexual imagery, the commonest being, in order: kissing, intercourse, sensual embrace oral sex and masturbation. The dreams can leave us flushed with pleasure or filled with jealousy. They are often unsettling, too. What does it mean to have a sexual dream about an ex?

What if your partner has one about someone else? Do they reveal anything about our desires? single men have a higher frequency of erotic dreams compared to men in stable partnerships. On the other hand, women report more sexual dreams when they miss their partners or are at the height of a love affair. Men report no similar surge in erotic dreams in those scenarios. But there’s one way in which the dreaming life of men and women align — almost all of us cheat in our dreams.

What should we make of this? As creators of our dreams, we select the cast of our nocturnal dramas, the stage and the action. The dreams we conjure are our own sensual productions. Wouldn’t a dream where we cheat on a partner be a sign that we are looking to be unfaithful, or are at least open to it? Surely an erotic dream is our libido unfiltered and unleashed. If not, then what could it possibly be? All dreams are the product of the Imagination Network in our brains, unbound by the rules and logic of our waking life.

When we’re dreaming, the imagination is unfettered, free to find loose associations and connections in our memories. It can lead us to think about the people in our lives in surprising, disturbing and even erotic ways. Because the logical Executive Network in our brains is shut down during dreaming, we can’t stop these erotic flights of fancy before they take off.

They are also free from judgment — even our own. In erotic dreams we are liberated to imagine sexual encounters that would be taboo or inconceivable in our waking lives. They will probably not involve our current partner. Instead, we have more of an inclination towards novel sexual interactions. So, what do erotic dreams really mean? Researchers have conducted surveys on sexual activity, asking how happy people are in their romantic relationships, whether they have jealous personalities and how these characteristics impact on their dreams.

The scientists tried to provoke erotic dreams by asking participants to watch porn. What they found was surprising. Erotic dreams are not tied to how much sex you are having in your waking life, nor to whether you masturbate. They are not even connected to how much porn you consume. The best predictor of erotic dreaming seems to be how much of our waking life we spend daydreaming about erotic fantasies.

This makes us more open to erotic dreams at night. However, there’s one key difference between daytime fantasies and erotic dreams. When we fantasise during the day, our thoughts are reined in by the rational part of our brain, the Executive Network , which constrains sexual desires. This moderating influence is gone when we dream, allowing our erotic dreams to be wildly creative and exploratory.

From this I conclude that erotic dreams are more like thought experiments than a sign of the type of latent desires that Freud wrote about. We can switch genders or become bisexual, even if it never crosses our minds during the day. Erotic dreams are undeniably deeply pleasurable. In a survey of university students in China, they agreed overwhelmingly with the following statements: ‘I hope to immerse myself in a sexual dream and never wake up’, ‘I feel lucky to have sexual dreams’, and ‘I am sad after waking up from a sexual dream because I find it was just a dream.’

How can it be that imagined sex carries such emotional, libidinal weight? These are, after all, solitary, imagined events outside of our conscious control. It seems implausible that they could mean so much to us, but they do. The answer is that erotic dreams have this kind of power because the brain is our most powerful sex organ. Erotic dreams do more than just reflect or release our emotions, imagination and libido.

They can deliver the same intense pleasure as actual sex. They might even be better than the real thing. In erotic dreams, the brain is not receiving any signals of touching or of being touched. Erotic dreams occur in the brain alone. Even so, more than two-thirds of men and more than a third of women say they’ve experienced orgasms simply as the result of a dream. Consider what is happening in the brain during the physical act of sex.

Sexual activity draws upon every bit of our central nervous system, which sends signals to the brain during sex. The crucial thing is that the brain interprets them. You can be touched in the same place, with the same pressure, in the same fashion, and your brain can view it as something insignificant. Or see it as a frisson or a caress. In which case, it doesn’t matter where you’re touched. The brain alone is what determines sexual significance, causes us to feel attraction (or not), to become aroused (or not), our breathing to quicken (or not) and our heart to race (or not). In erotic dreams, however, the body is silent.

During our most vivid dreams, muscles needed for coordinated movement are essentially paralysed below the neck. The brain is not reacting to signals from the body, but is instead acting out its own imagination. As erotic dreams show us, the brain doesn’t need the rest of the body at all. The mind is its own erogenous zone, and dreams can pursue the pleasures of the flesh without any flesh other than the brain itself.

If this all sounds impossible, think about other aspects of how we perceive and respond to the world. Consider sight, for example. The lens and cornea work together to focus light on the retina at the back of the eye, but it is the brain that processes what is seen into a single, clear view of the world. Without the brain, we do not see. Erotic dreams are the same. With no sensory inputs at all, the brain creates and perceives full-bodied pleasure.

Sex and other erotic pleasures we experience in our dreams are not felt any differently because, as far as the brain is concerned, there is no difference. The brain does not experience real orgasms or fake ones; to the brain, they are all real. And since, during dreams, our unrestrained emotional system can exceed levels we reach in waking life, it’s reasonable to conclude that a dream orgasm can take us to heights that waking sex cannot. What, then, do erotic dreams reveal about our relationships?

The science suggests that dreams of infidelity are unlikely to be a signal that we want to be unfaithful. They are far more likely to be the brain’s Imagination Network in action. Cheating on a partner in a dream may simply be a sign of curiosity and normal sexual arousal, rather than a desire to stray from the relationship. Nor are dreams where we explore a different sexual orientation a sign of a repressed desire.

This, too, appears to be more curiosity, libido and imagination at play. Even so, erotic dreams have plenty to tell us about both the health of our current romantic relationships and how well we have got over former partners, but perhaps not in the way we may expect. Sexual dreams can elicit strong feelings of desire, jealousy, love, sadness or joy powerful enough to affect how we feel about our partner the next day.

Just like the sensations in the dream, the brain perceives the emotions as real. Researchers have found conflict with a partner in a dream tends to result in conflict the following day. In unhealthy relationships, infidelity dreams are associated with decreased feelings of love and intimacy in the days that follow. In healthy relationships, infidelity dreams don’t have much of an effect at all. How we feel about a partner during our waking hours can also affect our dreams.

Feelings of jealousy during the day can produce dreams of infidelity, which in turn affect a dreamer’s behaviour towards their partner. In these cases, dreams and reality appear to feed on each other in a negative loop. It’s likely that negative emotions in an erotic dream about a partner could serve as an important signal of how you feel about that person. But the emotions associated with erotic dreams are far more important than the dream narrative itself.

If you or your partner have a dream of being unfaithful, this is not a sign of anyone’s true desires. Even though you may wake up unsettled or upset, remember that dreams are designed to make us think divergently, including about our sex lives. What really counts is not our erotic dream narrative or our partner’s, but how we react to these dreams.

Ex-pARTNERS can and do show up in dreams long after they have ceased to be a part of our lives. While dreams of current partners often involve doing something together, dreams of ex-partners are more likely to be erotic. You may be tempted to conclude that this means we’re longing for an ex. But based on a number of studies, the opposite is usually true.

These dreams appear to be helping us to get over our former partners. They may simply be a way of processing the emotions of a break-up. There may, though, be a more fundamental purpose to erotic dreams — as a way our brains have evolved to protect humanity and prepare it for procreation.

My belief is that erotic dreams are a cognitive platform on which sexual fluidity and ingenuity are created; ‘wildcards’ that could help our species to survive by giving us flexible desires so that we have the means to reproduce even in the most extreme circumstances. If, say, half our tribe was wiped out by disease, erotic dreams like these could have readied our ancestors for new engagements and entanglements within our tribe.

This may also help explain why erotic dreams tend to stick close to home. The characters in our erotic dreams are rarely inventive, but the interactions often are. In this way, erotic dreams are more than our true desires — they are the embodiment of desire itself. They prime us for sexual exploration and a breadth of sexual impulses. This makes sense when we remember that the essential biological imperative of life is to survive long enough to reproduce. Our brains have developed so they are highly tuned to erotic thinking. Fantasy, erotic dreaming — and ultimately our sexuality — arose from the drive to procreate.

作为一名神经外科医生和研究科学家,梦对我来说有着特殊的吸引力。我一生都在研究大脑,我不仅迷恋它的无限复杂性,而且对它最伟大、最神秘的特征之一–做梦–也着迷到了痴迷的地步。梦的来源与所有精神活动一样–我们活着的每时每刻都有电波在大脑中流动。

梦是大脑正常功能的产物,也是我们每晚睡觉时,大脑按照昼夜节律–昼夜循环–发生的非凡变化,而昼夜节律正是生物生命的主宰。每晚,我们的大脑和身体都会重复 90 分钟的轻度睡眠周期,然后是深度睡眠,在深度睡眠中,脑电波缓慢而有节奏。眼睛开始在眼睑下转动,身体的大部分肌肉都会变得麻痹。

当眼球在眼皮下跳动时,这被称为快速眼动睡眠或快速动眼睡眠。快速眼动睡眠和做梦通常被描述为同义词,但这是不准确的。我们在睡眠的各个阶段都会做梦。但快速眼动睡眠是梦境最强烈、最离奇的时候。梦境会随着夜晚的进展而变化。

清晨的梦往往包含更多清醒生活中的元素。夜深人静时做的梦更有可能是情绪化的,并包含较早的自传体记忆,而我们最有可能记住的正是这些在我们醒来之前做的梦。梦境的基调也会发生变化。夜晚开始时,梦境会变得更加消极,而随着时间的推移,梦境会变得更加积极。

梦深深地影响着我们,因为我们把它们当作真实的体验。我们在梦中感受到的快乐与清醒时感受到的快乐在生理上并无不同;恐怖、沮丧、性兴奋、愤怒和恐惧也是如此。在梦中奔跑,大脑运动皮层会被激活–如果你真的在奔跑,你也会用到大脑的这一部分。在梦中感受爱人的抚摸,感觉皮层也会受到刺激,就像在清醒时一样。

如果我们睡眠不足,首先要做的就是做梦。如果我们有足够的睡眠,但却缺少梦境,那么我们一入睡就会立即开始做梦。如今,人们越来越关注睡眠对健康的重要性,但我们真正需要的可能不是睡眠,而是梦。

做春梦是人类天性的一部分。即使你想阻止,也阻止不了。更年期不会让它们消失,化学阉割也不会。无论你是性活跃者、独身者、已婚者还是单身者,这都无关紧要。性梦是普遍存在的。在调查中,90% 的英国人、87% 的德国人、77% 的加拿大人、70% 的中国人、68% 的日本人和 66% 的美国人都做过性梦。

据估计,每 12 个梦中就有一个包含性意象,最常见的依次是:接吻、性交、性感拥抱、口交和手淫。这些梦境可能让我们兴奋不已,也可能让我们充满嫉妒。它们通常也会让人感到不安。做关于前男友的性梦意味着什么?

如果你的伴侣做了关于别人的性梦呢?这些梦是否揭示了我们的欲望?与有稳定伴侣的男性相比,单身男性做春梦的频率更高。另一方面,女性会在思念伴侣或处于热恋期时做更多的性梦。在这些情况下,男性的春梦次数并没有出现类似的激增。但是,有一种方式让男性和女性的梦境生活趋于一致–我们几乎所有人都会在梦中出轨。

我们应该如何看待这个问题呢?作为梦境的创造者,我们选择了夜间戏剧的演员、舞台和动作。我们所做的梦是我们自己的感性作品。如果我们梦见自己欺骗了伴侣,这难道不是表明我们想要不忠,或者至少是愿意不忠吗?情色梦境肯定是我们的性欲未经过滤的释放。如果不是,那它又是什么呢?所有的梦都是我们大脑中想象力网络的产物,不受清醒生活的规则和逻辑约束。

当我们做梦时,想象力不受束缚,可以自由地在记忆中寻找松散的联想和联系。它会引导我们以令人惊讶、不安甚至色情的方式去思考生活中的人。由于大脑中的逻辑执行网络在做梦时关闭,我们无法在这些色情幻想起飞前阻止它们。

它们也不受评判,甚至不受我们自己的评判。在情色梦境中,我们可以自由地想象那些在清醒时是禁忌或难以想象的性接触。它们可能不会涉及我们现在的伴侣。相反,我们更倾向于新奇的性互动。那么,春梦到底意味着什么呢?研究人员对性活动进行了调查,询问人们在恋爱关系中的幸福程度、是否具有嫉妒性格以及这些特征对他们的梦境有何影响。

科学家们试图通过让参与者观看色情片来激发色情梦。他们的发现令人吃惊。情色梦与你清醒时的性生活次数无关,也与你是否手淫无关。它们甚至与你看了多少色情片也没有关系。最能预测情色梦境的因素似乎是我们在清醒的生活中花了多少时间做情色白日梦。

这让我们在晚上更容易做春梦。然而,白天的幻想和春梦之间有一个关键的区别。当我们在白天幻想时,我们的思想会受到大脑中理性部分(执行网络)的控制,从而抑制性欲望。而当我们做梦时,这种调节作用就会消失,从而使我们的春梦充满创造性和探索性。

由此我得出结论,情色梦更像是思想实验,而不是弗洛伊德笔下那种潜在欲望的表现。我们可以转换性别或成为双性恋,即使我们白天从未想过这一点。不可否认,春梦会给人带来极大的快感。在一项针对中国大学生的调查中,他们绝大多数都同意以下说法: 我希望沉浸在性梦中,永远不要醒来”、”我为做性梦感到幸运”、”从性梦中醒来后,我很难过,因为我发现那只是一场梦”。

想象中的性爱怎么会有如此强烈的情感和性欲呢?毕竟,这些都是单独的、想象出来的事件,不受我们意识的控制。它们对我们如此重要似乎难以置信,但它们确实如此。答案是,情色梦之所以具有这种力量,是因为大脑是我们最强大的性器官。情色梦不只是反映或释放我们的情感、想象力和性欲。

它们能带来与真实性爱同样强烈的快感。它们甚至可能比真实的性爱更美妙。在情色梦中,大脑不会接收到任何触摸或被触摸的信号。情色梦境只发生在大脑中。即便如此,仍有超过三分之二的男性和超过三分之一的女性表示,他们仅仅因为梦境而体验过性高潮。想想在性爱过程中大脑会发生什么吧。

性活动动用了我们中枢神经系统的每一个部分,而中枢神经系统会在性活动中向大脑发送信号。关键在于大脑如何解读这些信号。你可以在同一个地方,用同样的压力,以同样的方式被抚摸,而你的大脑可以将其视为无关紧要的事情。或者将其视为一种刺激或爱抚。在这种情况下,你被触摸的地方并不重要。只有大脑才能决定性的意义,让我们感受到吸引(或没有),唤起(或没有),呼吸加快(或没有),心跳加速(或没有)。然而,在情色梦境中,身体是沉默的。

在我们最生动的梦境中,颈部以下协调运动所需的肌肉基本上处于瘫痪状态。大脑没有对来自身体的信号做出反应,而是在发挥自己的想象力。情色梦境告诉我们,大脑根本不需要身体的其他部分。大脑是自己的性感带,梦境可以追求肉体的快感,除了大脑本身,不需要任何肉体。

如果这一切听起来不可能,那就想想我们如何感知和回应世界的其他方面。比如说视觉。晶状体和角膜共同作用,将光线聚焦到眼球后部的视网膜上,但大脑将所看到的东西处理成单一、清晰的世界观。没有大脑,我们就看不见。春梦也是如此。在没有任何感官输入的情况下,大脑会创造并感知全身心的愉悦。

我们在梦中体验到的性爱和其他情欲快感并没有什么不同,因为在大脑看来,它们并没有什么不同。大脑不会体验到真正的高潮或虚假的高潮;对大脑来说,它们都是真实的。既然在梦中,我们无拘无束的情感系统可以超越清醒时的水平,那么我们有理由得出结论,梦中的性高潮可以让我们达到清醒时性爱无法达到的高度。那么,色情梦对我们的人际关系有何启示呢?

科学表明,梦见不忠不太可能是我们想要不忠的信号。它们更有可能是大脑的想象网络在起作用。在梦中欺骗伴侣可能只是好奇心和正常的性兴奋的表现,而不是想要脱离这种关系。我们在梦中探索不同的性取向,也不是压抑欲望的表现。

这似乎也是好奇心、性欲和想象力在作祟。即便如此,情色梦境还是能告诉我们很多信息,包括我们当前恋爱关系的健康状况,以及我们对前任伴侣的忘却程度,但也许并不是我们所期望的那样。性梦会引发强烈的欲望、嫉妒、爱、悲伤或喜悦,足以影响我们第二天对伴侣的感觉。

就像梦中的感觉一样,大脑会把这些情绪视为真实的。研究人员发现,梦中与伴侣的冲突往往会导致第二天的冲突。在不健康的人际关系中,不忠的梦与第二天爱和亲密感的减少有关。而在健康的人际关系中,不忠之梦根本不会产生太大的影响。我们在清醒时对伴侣的感觉也会影响我们的梦境。

白天的嫉妒情绪会产生不忠之梦,进而影响做梦者对伴侣的行为。在这种情况下,梦境和现实似乎在一个消极的循环中相互促进。情色梦境中关于伴侣的负面情绪很可能是你对伴侣感觉的重要信号。但是,与情色梦境相关的情绪远比梦境叙述本身更重要。

如果你或你的伴侣梦见自己不忠,这并不代表任何人的真实欲望。尽管你醒来后可能会感到不安或沮丧,但请记住,梦的目的是让我们发散思维,包括对性生活的思考。真正重要的不是我们或伴侣的色情梦境,而是我们对这些梦境的反应。

前伴侣可能会出现在梦中,而且在他们不再是我们生活的一部分之后很久也确实会出现在梦中。现任伴侣的梦境通常涉及一起做某事,而前任伴侣的梦境则更有可能是色情的。你可能会认为这意味着我们在渴望前任。但根据多项研究,事实通常恰恰相反。

这些梦似乎在帮助我们忘掉前任伴侣。它们可能只是处理分手情绪的一种方式。不过,情色梦可能有更根本的目的–是我们的大脑进化到保护人类和为生育做准备的一种方式。

我认为,情色梦是一个认知平台,在这个平台上,性的流动性和独创性得以产生;”通配符 “可以帮助我们这个物种生存下去,因为它赋予了我们灵活的欲望,使我们即使在最极端的情况下也有办法繁衍后代。比方说,如果我们的部落有一半被疾病消灭了,像这样的情色梦境可以让我们的祖先做好准备,在部落内部进行新的交往和纠葛。

这或许也有助于解释为什么情色梦境倾向于贴近家庭。我们情色梦境中的人物很少别出心裁,但互动却往往别出心裁。这样一来,情色梦就不仅仅是我们的真实欲望–它们是欲望本身的体现。它们为我们的性探索和广泛的性冲动提供了条件。如果我们记得,生命的基本生理要求是存活足够长的时间以繁衍后代,那么这就说得通了。我们的大脑已经发展到高度适应色情思维的程度。幻想、情色梦境–以及最终我们的性欲–都源于繁衍后代的动力。

通过http://DeepL.com(免费版)翻译

https://www.perthnow.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/what-it-really-means-when-you-dream-about-cheating-on-your-loved-ones-according-to-a-brain-surgeon–c-14137641

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (The Chronicles of Narnia #1) – Page 5/17

CHAPTER FIVE

BACK ON THIS SIDE OF THE DOOR

BECAUSE the game of hide-and-seek was still going on, it took Edmund and Lucy some time to find the others. But when at last they were all together (which happened in the long room, where the suit of armour was) Lucy burst out:

“Peter! Susan! It’s all true. Edmund has seen it too. There is a country you can get to through the wardrobe. Edmund and I both got in. We met one another in there, in the wood. Go on, Edmund; tell them all about it.”

“What’s all this about, Ed?” said Peter.

And now we come to one of the nastiest things in this story. Up to that moment Edmund had been feeling sick, and sulky, and annoyed with Lucy for being right, but he hadn’t made up his mind what to do. When Peter suddenly asked him the question he decided all at once to do the meanest and most spiteful thing he could think of. He decided to let Lucy down.

“Tell us, Ed,” said Susan.

And Edmund gave a very superior look as if he were far older than Lucy (there was really only a year’s difference) and then a little snigger and said, “Oh, yes, Lucy and I have been playing – pretending that all her story about a country in the wardrobe is true. just for fun, of course. There’s nothing there really.”

Poor Lucy gave Edmund one look and rushed out of the room.

Edmund, who was becoming a nastier person every minute, thought that he had scored a great success, and went on at once to say, “There she goes again. What’s the matter with her? That’s the worst of young kids, they always – “

“Look here,” said Peter, turning on him savagely, “shut up! You’ve been perfectly beastly to Lu ever since she started this nonsense about the wardrobe, and now you go playing games with her about it and setting her off again. I believe you did it simply out of spite.”

“But it’s all nonsense,” said Edmund, very taken aback.

“Of course it’s all nonsense,” said Peter, “that’s just the point. Lu was perfectly all right when we left home, but since we’ve been down here she seems to be either going queer in the head or else turning into a most frightful liar. But whichever it is, what good do you think you’ll do by jeering and nagging at her one day and encouraging her the next?”

“I thought – I thought,” said Edmund; but he couldn’t think of anything to say.

“You didn’t think anything at all,” said Peter; “it’s just spite. You’ve always liked being beastly to anyone smaller than yourself; we’ve seen that at school before now.”

“Do stop it,” said Susan; “it won’t make things any better having a row between you two. Let’s go and find Lucy.”

It was not surprising that when they found Lucy, a good deal later, everyone could see that she had been crying. Nothing they could say to her made any difference. She stuck to her story and said:

“I don’t care what you think, and I don’t care what you say. You can tell the Professor or you can write to Mother or you can do anything you like. I know I’ve met a Faun in there and – I wish I’d stayed there and you are all beasts, beasts.”

It was an unpleasant evening. Lucy was miserable and Edmund was beginning to feel that his plan wasn’t working as well as he had expected. The two older ones were really beginning to think that Lucy was out of her mind. They stood in the passage talking about it in whispers long after she had gone to bed.

The result was the next morning they decided that they really would go and tell the whole thing to the Professor. “He’ll write to Father if he thinks there is really something wrong with Lu,” said Peter; “it’s getting beyond us.” So they went and knocked at the study door, and the Professor said “Come in,” and got up and found chairs for them and said he was quite at their disposal. Then he sat listening to them with the tips of his fingers pressed together and never interrupting, till they had finished the whole story. After that he said nothing for quite a long time. Then he cleared his throat and said the last thing either of them expected:

“How do you know,” he asked, “that your sister’s story is not true?”

“Oh, but – ” began Susan, and then stopped. Anyone could see from the old man’s face that he was perfectly serious. Then Susan pulled herself together and said, “But Edmund said they had only been pretending.”

“That is a point,” said the Professor, “which certainly deserves consideration; very careful consideration. For instance – if you will excuse me for asking the question – does your experience lead you to regard your brother or your sister as the more reliable? I mean, which is the more truthful?”

“That’s just the funny thing about it, sir,” said Peter. “Up till now, I’d have said Lucy every time.”

“And what do you think, my dear?” said the Professor, turning to Susan.

“Well,” said Susan, “in general, I’d say the same as Peter, but this couldn’t be true – all this about the wood and the Faun.”

“That is more than I know,” said the Professor, “and a charge of lying against someone whom you have always found truthful is a very serious thing; a very serious thing indeed.”

“We were afraid it mightn’t even be lying,” said Susan; “we thought there might be something wrong with Lucy.”

“Madness, you mean?” said the Professor quite coolly. “Oh, you can make your minds easy about that. One has only to look at her and talk to her to see that she is not mad.”

“But then,” said Susan, and stopped. She had never dreamed that a grown-up would talk like the Professor and didn’t know what to think.

“Logic!” said the Professor half to himself. “Why don’t they teach logic at these schools? There are only three possibilities. Either your sister is telling lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth. You know she doesn’t tell lies and it is obvious that she is not mad For the moment then and unless any further evidence turns up, we must assume that she is telling the truth.”

Susan looked at him very hard and was quite sure from the expression on his face that he was no making fun of them.

“But how could it be true, sir?” said Peter.

“Why do you say that?” asked the Professor.

“Well, for one thing,” said Peter, “if it was true why doesn’t everyone find this country every time they go to the wardrobe? I mean, there was nothing there when we looked; even Lucy didn’t pretend the was.”

“What has that to do with it?” said the Professor.

“Well, sir, if things are real, they’re there all the time.”

“Are they?” said the Professor; and Peter did’nt know quite what to say.

“But there was no time,” said Susan. “Lucy had no time to have gone anywhere, even if there was such a place. She came running after us the very moment we were out of the room. It was less than minute, and she pretended to have been away for hours.”

“That is the very thing that makes her story so likely to be true,” said the Professor. “If there really a door in this house that leads to some other world (and I should warn you that this is a very strange house, and even I know very little about it) – if, I say, she had got into another world, I should not be at a surprised to find that the other world had a separate time of its own; so that however long you stay there it would never take up any of our time. On the other hand, I don’t think many girls of her age would invent that idea for themselves. If she had been pretending, she would have hidden for a reasonable time before coming out and telling her story.”

“But do you really mean, sir,” said Peter, “that there could be other worlds – all over the place, just round the corner – like that?”

“Nothing is more probable,” said the Professor, taking off his spectacles and beginning to polish them, while he muttered to himself, “I wonder what they do teach them at these schools.”

“But what are we to do?” said Susan. She felt that the conversation was beginning to get off the point.

“My dear young lady,” said the Professor, suddenly looking up with a very sharp expression at both of them, “there is one plan which no one has yet suggested and which is well worth trying.”

“What’s that?” said Susan.

“We might all try minding our own business,” said he. And that was the end of that conversation.

After this things were a good deal better for Lucy. Peter saw to it that Edmund stopped jeering at her, and neither she nor anyone else felt inclined to talk about the wardrobe at all. It had become a rather alarming subject. And so for a time it looked as if all the adventures were coming to an end; but that was not to be.

This house of the Professor’s – which even he knew so little about – was so old and famous that people from all over England used to come and ask permission to see over it. It was the sort of house that is mentioned in guide books and even in histories; and well it might be, for all manner of stories were told about it, some of them even stranger than the one I am telling you now. And when parties of sightseers arrived and asked to see the house, the Professor always gave them permission, and Mrs Macready, the housekeeper, showed them round, telling them about the pictures and the armour, and the rare books in the library. Mrs Macready was not fond of children, and did not like to be interrupted when she was telling visitors all the things she knew. She had said to Susan and Peter almost on the first morning (along with a good many other instructions), “And please remember you’re to keep out of the way whenever I’m taking a party over the house.”

“Just as if any of us would want to waste half the morning trailing round with a crowd of strange grown-ups!” said Edmund, and the other three thought the same. That was how the adventures began for the second time.

A few mornings later Peter and Edmund were looking at the suit of armour and wondering if they could take it to bits when the two girls rushed into the room and said, “Look out! Here comes the Macready and a whole gang with her.”

“Sharp’s the word,” said Peter, and all four made off through the door at the far end of the room. But when they had got out into the Green Room and beyond it, into the Library, they suddenly heard voices ahead of them, and realized that Mrs Macready must be bringing her party of sightseers up the back stairs – instead of up the front stairs as they had expected. And after that – whether it was that they lost their heads, or that Mrs Macready was trying to catch them, or that some magic in the house had come to life and was chasing them into Narnia they seemed to find themselves being followed everywhere, until at last Susan said, “Oh bother those trippers! Here – let’s get into the Wardrobe Room till they’ve passed. No one will follow us in there.” But the moment they were inside they heard the voices in the passage – and then someone fumbling at the door – and then they saw the handle turning.

“Quick!” said Peter, “there’s nowhere else,” and flung open the wardrobe. All four of them bundled inside it and sat there, panting, in the dark. Peter held the door closed but did not shut it; for, of course, he remembered, as every sensible person does, that you should never never shut yourself up in a wardrobe.

https://allnovel.net/the-lion-the-witch-and-the-wardrobe-the-chronicles-of-narnia-1/page-5.html

The Boy Behind the Mask

Tom Hallman Jr.

Photos by Benjamin Brink
The Oregonian   October 1, 2000, Part 1

At a certain age, nothing is more important than fitting in

The boy sits on the living room sofa, lost in his thoughts and stroking the family cat with his fragile hands. His younger brother and sister sit on the floor, chattering and playing cards. But Sam is overcome by an urge to be alone. He lifts the cat off his lap, ignoring a plaintive meow, and silently stands, tottering unsteadily as his thin frame rises in the afternoon light.

He threads his way toward the kitchen, where his mother bends over the sink, washing vegetables for supper. Most 14-year-old boys whirl through a room, slapping door jambs and dodging around furniture like imaginary halfbacks. But this boy, a 5-foot, 83-pound waif, has learned never to draw attention to himself. He moves like smoke.

He stops in the door frame leading to the kitchen and melts into the late-afternoon shadows.

He watches his mother, humming as she runs water over lettuce. The boy clears his throat and says he’s not hungry. His mother sighs with worry and turns, not bothering to turn off the water or to dry her hands. The boy knows she’s studying him, running her eyes over his bony arms and the way he wearily props himself against the door frame. She’s been watching him like this since he left the hospital a few months before.

“I’m full,” he says.

She bends her head toward him, about to speak. He cuts her off.

“Really, Mom. I’m full.”

“OK, Sam,” she says quietly.

The boy slips behind his mother and steps into a pool of light.

A huge mass of flesh balloons out from the left side of his face.

His left ear, purple and misshapen, bulges from the side of his head. His chin juts forward. The main body of tissue, laced with blue veins, swells in a dome that runs from sideburn level to chin. The mass draws his left eye into a slit, warps his mouth into a small, inverted half moon. It looks as though someone has slapped three pounds of wet clay onto his face, where it clings, burying the boy inside.

Sam Lightner at a meeting of his Boy Scout troop.

But Sam, the boy behind the mask, peers out from the right eye. It is clear, perfectly formed and a deep, penetrating brown.

You find yourself instantly drawn into that eye, pulled past the deformity and into the world of a completely normal 14-year-old. It is a window into the world where Sam lives. You can imagine yourself on the other side of it. You can see yourself in that eye, the child you once were.

The third of Sam’s face surrounding his normal eye reinforces the impression. His healthy, close-cropped hair is a luxuriant brown, shaped carefully in a style any serious young man might wear. It’s trimmed neatly behind a delicate, well-formed ear. His right cheek glows with the blushing good health that the rest of his face has obscured.

The boy passes out of the kitchen, stepping into the staircase that leads to the second floor. A ragged burst of air escapes from the hole in his throat—a tracheotomy funnels air directly into his lungs, bypassing the swollen tissue that blocks the usual airways. He walks along the worn hallway and turns into his room, the one with the toy license plate on the door. It reads “Sam.”

The Northeast Portland house, wood-framed with a wide front porch and fading cream-colored paint, is like thousands of others on Portland’s gentrifying eastside. Real estate prices have soared, but the Lightners still need new carpets in every room and could use new appliances. Although she’d rather stay home with the children, Debbie Lightner works part time as a bank teller. The paycheck helps, but she really took the job for the health insurance.

From upstairs, Sam hears 12-year-old Emily and 9-year-old Nathan laughing. The kitchen, though, is silent. The boy figures his mother and father are talking about him and this night. For months Feb. 3, 2000, has been circled on the family calendar that hangs on a kitchen wall.

He grabs a small foam basketball and throws up an arcing shot that soars across the room and hits a poster tacked to the far wall.

His mother made the poster by assembling family photographs and then laminating them. In the middle is a questionnaire Sam filled out when he was 8. He had been asked to list his three wishes. He wanted $1 million and a dog. On the third line, he doodled three question marks—in those oblivious days of childhood, he couldn’t think of anything else he needed.

The morning routine around the family’s Northeast Portland house gets hectic when five Lightners line up for one bathroom, hunt for socks, eat breakfast and rush out the door. But Debbie Lightner still finds time for play with Sam as she challenges his decision about the shirt he’ll wear to school.

Finally, his mother calls out. His teeth are brushed, his face washed. He runs his left hand through his brown hair, parting it to the right.

He must imagine what he looks like. There’s no mirror to examine his face.

In this boy’s room, there’s never been a mirror.

“Ready for this, Sam?” asks David Lightner, a weathered jewelry designer who saves money by riding a motorcycle 25 miles to work. Sam nods his head and replies with a garbled sound, wheezing and breathless, the sound of an old man who has smoked too long and too hard.

“OK,” his father replies. “Let’s go.”

His sister and brother watch from the window as Sam and his parents walk to a Honda Accord that has 140,000 hard miles on the odometer. The boy gets in the back seat, and the Honda backs down the driveway.

Just a few blocks from home, Sam senses someone looking at him. After a lifetime of stares, he can feel the glances.

The Accord is stopped at a light, waiting to turn west onto Northeast Sandy Boulevard, when a woman walking a poodle catches sight of him. She makes no pretense of being polite, of averting her eyes. When the light changes, the woman swivels her head as if watching a train leave a station.

On school mornings, Sam rustles up his own breakfast, and his sweet tooth sometimes gets the better of him. His wholesome side might lead him to microwave a bowl of hot cereal. But he’s just as likely to top it with chocolate syrup.

Grant High School’s open house attracts more than 1,500 students and parents. Even though they’ve come early, the Lightners must search for a parking place. Sam’s father circles the streets until he finds one nearly 15 blocks from the school.

The family steps out onto the sidewalk and walks through the dark neighborhood. As Sam passes under a streetlight, a dark-green Range Rover full of teen-age boys turns onto the street. A kid wearing a baseball cap points at the boy. The car slows. The windows fill with faces, staring and pointing.

Sam walks on.

Soon, the streets fill with teen-agers on their way to Grant. Sam recognizes a girl who goes to his school, Gregory Heights Middle School. Sam has a secret crush on her. She has brown hair, wavy, and a smile that makes his hands sweat and his heart race when he sees her in class.

“Hi, Sam,” she says.

He nods.

“Hi,” he says.

The boy’s parents fall behind, allowing their son and the girl to walk side by side. She does most of the talking.

He’s spent a lifetime trying to make himself understood, and he’s found alternatives to the words that are so hard for him to shape. He uses his good eye and hand gestures to get his point across.

Two blocks from Grant, kids jam the streets. The wavy-haired girl subtly, discreetly, falls behind. When the boy slows to match her step, she hurries ahead. Sam lets her go and walks alone.

Grant, a great rectangular block of brick, looms in the distance. Every light in the place is on. Tonight, there are no shadows.

He arrives at the north door and stands on the steps, looking in through the windowpanes. Clusters of girls hug and laugh. Boys huddle under a sign announcing a basketball game.

Sam grabs the door handle, hesitates for the briefest of moments and pulls the door open. He steps inside.

He walks into noise and laughter and chaos, into the urgency that is all about being 14 years old.

Into a place where nothing is worse than being different.

*   *   *

Sam in computer roomThe computer room in Sam’s house is out of main traffic patterns, and it’s a place where Sam can slip off into his own world. On the Internet, Sam is just another screen name in a chat room, where his words speak for themselves, unfiltered by his distorted voice or his appearance.

Years later she still wonders if it was something she missed, some sign that things weren’t right. But it wasn’t until her seventh month that Debbie Lightner learned something had gone terribly awry.

She struggled to sit up on the examination table. The baby, her doctor said, was larger than it should be. Debbie watched him wheel up a machine to measure the fetus. She felt his hands on her stomach.

“Something’s wrong,” the doctor said again.

He told Debbie he would call ahead to the hospital and schedule an ultrasound. He laughed and told Debbie he just wanted to be sure she wasn’t having twins.

The next morning, at the ultrasound lab, the technician got right to work.

He immediately ruled out twins.

Then, a few minutes into the test, the technician fell silent. He repeatedly pressed a button to take pictures of the images on the monitor. After 30 minutes, he turned off the machine, left the room and returned with his boss. The two studied the photographs.

They led the Lightners down the hall to a prenatal specialist. Their unborn child, he said, appeared to have a birth defect. The ultrasound indicated that the child’s brain was floating outside the body.

He had to be blunt. This child will die.

Some parents, he said, would choose to terminate.

No, Debbie remembers telling him. She and her husband were adamant that they would not kill this baby.

On Sunday, Oct. 6, 1985, six weeks before she was due, Debbie went into labor at home. David drove her to the hospital, and the staff rushed her to the delivery room for an emergency Caesarean.

She heard a baby cry. A boy. The boy they’d decided to name Sam.

She passed out.

When she came to, she asked to hold her child.

No, her husband said. The boy was in intensive care. He needed surgery.

David handed his wife two Polaroids a nurse had taken. A bulging growth covered the left side of the baby’s face and the area under his neck.

”What is it?“ Debbie asked.

“I don’t know,” David said. “But he’s alive.”

When the Lightners arrived at the neonatal ICU, they were led to an isolette, a covered crib, that regulates temperature and oxygen flow. A nurse had written “I am Sam; Sam I am”—a line from Green Eggs and Ham by Dr. Seuss—and taped it to the contraption.

Wires from a heart monitor snaked across the baby’s tiny chest. He was fragile, a nurse said, and they couldn’t hold him.

The mass fascinated Debbie, and she asked if she could touch her son.

The nurse lifted the cover of the isolette, and Debbie reached down with a finger. The mass was soft. It jiggled. Debbie thought it looked like Jell-O.

The nurse closed the cover.

Debbie and her husband returned to her room, and she climbed into bed. She picked up one of the pictures her husband had given her and covered the mass with her fingers to see what her son should have looked like. He had brown hair and eyes.

She wept.

*   *   *

The temptation is to break ranks during a family portrait, and wave when a neighbor drives by. Still almost everyone stays in character, Nathan, 9, is a cutup who mugs for the camera. Emily 12, tries to stay dignified. Maggie, the vocal family dog, is uncharacteristically quiet, but David and Debbie are their naturally casual selves.

Tim Campbell, a pediatric surgeon known for tackling tough cases, walked into the ICU and peered into the isolette. The boy had a vascular anomaly. They were rare enough, but what this tiny infant had was even rarer. The anomaly was a living mass of blood vessels. And it had invaded the left side of Sam’s face, replacing what should have been there with a terrible tangle of lymphatic and capillary cells.

The malformation extended from his ear to his chin. Campbell knew there was no way to simply slice it off, as if it were a wart, because it had burrowed its way deep inside Sam’s tissue. Doctors knew little about such anomalies except that they were made up of fluid-filled cysts and clots that varied in size from microscopic to as big as a fingertip.

Campbell gently pulled the baby’s mouth open. The mass swelled up from below and wormed its way into his tongue, threatening to block his air passage. He could barely breathe, and only immediate action would save him. He asked a nurse to direct him to the Lightner room.

Campbell introduced himself, explaining the surgery. He didn’t mince words.

“I’m going to be in there a long time,” the Lightners remember him saying. “It’s risky. He’s little, and he’s premature.”

Campbell operated for six hours and removed 1 pound, 10 ounces of tissue from under Sam’s neck. He operated a second time to remove bulk above his left ear and to ease his breathing with a tracheotomy tube. But there was no way, he told the Lightners, that he could safely remove the mass on Sam’s face.

Campbell had sliced away a quarter of the infant’s weight. Baby Sam, who weighed 5 pounds after the surgeries, spent three months recovering in the hospital.

*   *   *

He was 3 when he first realized he was different. His father remembers Sam running up and down a hallway when he stopped in midstride and stared at his image in a full-length mirror. He touched the left side of his face, almost as if to prove to himself that he was in fact that boy in the mirror.

He cried.

His parents had been expecting this day. His father bent over and took Sam by the hand. He led him to a bedroom off the hall. Debbie joined them. David lifted Sam onto the bed. And then his parents told the little boy the complicated facts of his life.

Except for the deformity, Sam was normal in every way. But everyone outside Sam’s circle of family and friends would have a hard time seeing beyond the mass of tissue on his face.

And so it was.

A little girl grabbed her mother’s hand when Debbie pushed Sam, in a stroller, onto an elevator. The girl stared at the little boy, pointed at him and then loudly told her mother to “look at the ugly baby.”

Bystanders often assumed Sam was retarded. A woman asked Debbie what drugs she had taken during her pregnancy. Strangers said they’d pray for the boy. Others just shook their heads and turned away.

His parents went to another surgeon to see if he could reduce the mass. He removed some tissue from behind Sam’s left ear but encountered heavy bleeding and closed up. Even then, the incisions wouldn’t heal. Sam bled for six weeks.

When the Lightners realized their son would have to live with his face, they refused to hide him from the world. They took him to the mall, to the beach, to restaurants. In Northeast Portland, where the Lightner family lived, people talked about seeing a strange-looking boy. “That boy,” they called him.

The Lightners enrolled Sam in the neighborhood school. Sam, his breathing labored, caused a stir during registration. Teachers worried about having the boy in their classes.

But he was an excellent student. He made friends, joined the Cub Scouts and played on a baseball team. He tried basketball for a year, but he fell easily because his head was so heavy.

When Sam turned 12, he told his parents that he wanted to change his face. They took him to Dr. Alan Seyfer, an OHSU professor who chaired the medical school’s department of plastic and reconstructive surgery. What Seyfer saw made him leery.

The mass was near vital nerves and blood vessels that surgery could destroy, leaving Sam with a paralyzed face. Hundreds of vessels ran through the deformed tissue, and every incision would cause terrible bleeding. Sam could bleed to death on the operating table.

Nonetheless, Seyfer, who spent 11 years as a Walter Reed Army Hospital surgeon, wanted to help. And so he scheduled Sam for surgery in June 1998. A month before he asked a friend, the chairman of the plastic-surgery department at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, to join him.

A week before the surgery, Seyfer and his partner examined Sam one last time. They peered down his throat so they could study the mass without having to make an incision.

They didn’t like the view.

That afternoon, Seyfer met with Sam and his parents and said he had made an agonizing decision. The surgery was too risky. In good faith, he could not operate.

The news crushed Sam. He realized he had always held out hope that a surgeon would pull him out of the horrible spotlight that targeted him every time he went out in public. But no. He was trapped.

Graduation from eighth grade is a big night for Sam—he wins the citizenship award and receives a huge round of applause from the crowd of parents and students. Sam’s father playfully tousles his hair on the way out of the auditorium as brother Nathan watches.

Sam Lightner pedaled his bike as hard as he could, but his family zoomed ahead. His legs ached, and he panted for breath. Even his younger brother could ride his bike farther and longer.

Most days during this spring 1999 vacation, Sam wanted to just lie in bed and watch television.

And when he spoke, his family kept asking him to repeat himself. No one—the desk clerk at Central Oregon’s Sunriver Lodge, the woman in the gift shop—could understand him. He garbled his speech, as if he were speaking with a mouthful of food.

But he wasn’t eating. At dinner, he sat with his family, listening, picking at his food, waiting to go lie down on the sofa. Over his protests, his mother took him into the bathroom and weighed him.

Five pounds, she said. He’d lost five pounds. But a later visit to his pediatrician turned up nothing.

Sam woke up one morning in pain. He touched his face and found it tender. The mass was growing. His mother gave him Advil, but the mass continued to swell. Within a week, he couldn’t swallow the pill. He stuck his finger in his throat. His tongue felt bigger. By the end of the week, Sam cried continually.

A doctor removed a lump where Sam’s shoulder met his neck, thinking the lump was pressing against a nerve. But the pain continued.

On Sunday, Aug. 8, 1999, Sam came downstairs from his bedroom. He found his mother outside, sitting on the front porch. He walked out and sat next to her, crying. His speech slurred, and he had to repeat himself. The pain, he managed to tell her, had spread across the entire left side of his face.

The next morning, at the hospital, nurses poked and probed his face. He sat still while strange machines whirled about his head. And then he waited while specialists reviewed the X-rays and CAT scans. They found nothing.

Sam refused to go home. Someone, he pleaded, had to help him.

Doctors admitted him and ran more tests. Four days later, on Aug. 13, the mass awakened.

Pain racked Sam’s body. He tried to call for help but couldn’t speak. With his fingers, he reached up. His swollen tongue stuck several inches out of his mouth. He punched the button beside his pillow to call for help.

He wrote in a notebook to communicate with nurses and doctors, a notebook his mother would later store away with the other memorabilia of Sam’s medical journey.

“I have no idea why. Since I was a baby. I was born with this.”

“When I cough hard, little capillaries burst and a little blood comes out.”

“Don’t touch.”

“Please, it hurts.”

He held out his arm so nurses could give him morphine. They fed him through a tube.

Then the door to his room opened, and a new doctor walked in. The man asked Sam if he knew him. Sam shook his head.

“I’m Tim Campbell,” the doctor said.

He’d been making routine rounds when he spotted Sam’s name on the patient board. Campbell hadn’t seen the boy since he’d operated on him nearly 14 years before, the day after he was born.

Dr. Campbell thumbed through the reports at the nurses’ station. He checked Sam’s chart. The boy weighed 65 pounds—he was wasting away.

Campbell pulled up a chair.

“How do you feel?”

Sam wrote in his notebook: “Anything to stop the headaches.”

“Anything else?”

“I really don’t think this is going to work out.”

“The doctors are trying.”

“Please try your hardest.”

“Hang in there, Sambo.”

“I’m in pain. It was really bad this morning.”

Campbell made a note to order more morphine.

“I hurt.”

And methadone.

“I’m tired.”

“Try to sleep.”

“Will it kill me?”

The Boy Behind the Mask

Tom Hallman Jr.

Photos by Benjamin Brink
The Oregonian   October 2, 2000, Part 2

Acceptance sometimes comes in the struggle to achieve it

Dr. Tim Campbell looked down into Sam Lightner’s face. The boy, he remembers thinking, was giving up. Unless something dramatic happened, he would die.

Dr. Tim Campbell, the Portland surgeon who operated on Sam shortly after his birth, was on routine hospital rounds when he encountered his old patient and resumed caring for him.

The 14-year-old lay motionless in his bed at Portland’s Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center. His bloated face spilled across most of the pillow. His tongue protruded grotesquely from his mouth, and the swelling on the left side of his face wrenched one eye completely out of position. In late summer of 1999, the deformity he’d carried since birth had suddenly grown to life-threatening size, choking off his airway and esophagus.

Sam, Campbell remembers thinking in blunt medical slang, was “circling the drain.” He’d seen the same look in children battling terminal cancer. At a certain point, they accepted their fate and surrendered to death.

The doctor hurried back to his office, rummaged through his desk drawers and pulled out a slim blue book, a list of every pediatric surgeon in North America. He flipped through the pages.

Campbell paused when he reached the résumé of Dr. Judah Folkman, a cancer researcher he’d met 30 years earlier when they were both young surgeons. Folkman’s research team had controlled tumors in mice by stifling the growth of the blood vessels that supplied them, causing a national stir and overwrought speculation that a cancer cure was at hand.

Folkman planned to test his technique on humans for the first time in May 1999. Campbell considered the fact that a wild excess of blood vessels had created Sam’s deformity. Maybe, he thought, Folkman’s strategy would work on the boy.

But Folkman, besieged by more than a thousand desperate cancer patients a week, is fiercely protective of his time. He grants no interviews. A secretary screens all calls.

Campbell punched in the telephone number listed in the blue book, hoping Folkman might grant a favor to an old friend. The secretary put him on hold. Then Folkman came on the line.

His response was discouraging. Sam’s malformation was fully formed, and his method worked only on growing tumors. But Folkman suggested Campbell call a pediatric surgeon who worked for him as a research fellow. Campbell scribbled out a name: Jennifer Marler.

She was a member of the Boston’s Children’s Hospital Vascular Anomalies Team, which treated malformations just like Sam’s. Pleas for help deluge that team, too, and the surgeons can respond to only a fraction. But when Campbell reached her, Folkman’s name provided instant access.

Marler suggested that Campbell take some photographs of Sam and send them along with the boy’s medical file. Campbell should address the package to her to make sure it didn’t get lost in the slush pile.

The best she could offer was that she’d take a look.

*   *   *

Sam Lightner turned his head and stared straight into the camera while Campbell photographed his face. After Campbell left the hospital room, a psychiatrist walked in, pulled up a chair and began asking questions. Sam scribbled his answers in the notebook he used to communicate.

Then Sam asked a question.

“Why is this happening?”

The psychiatrist had no answer. Instead, he asked another question. Tell me how you feel about life, Sam remembers him saying. Is life unfair?

How stupid, Sam thought. His tongue was sticking three inches out of his mouth. He couldn’t eat. His left eye bulged abnormally, reacting to pressure that seemed to build each hour. An IV drip line ran into his arm and pumped him full of drugs: morphine, methadone, Celebrex and nortriptyline—a combination of painkillers, anti-inflammatories and antidepressants. None of them helped. No one could tell him what was wrong.

Is life unfair?

“Sometimes.”

And then the swelling receded. Doctors couldn’t explain why, but the sudden eruption died down as mysteriously as it had come to life. On Sept. 2, 1999—after a month long hospital stay—Sam went home.

But everything was different. Physically, Sam was a shell. He had lost 17 pounds and was down to 63 pounds. He could not speak. And the battle with the malformation had scarred him. His mother remembers a listless child who wouldn’t stir from bed.

*   *   *

On Nov. 15, 1999, doctors determined Sam was healthy enough to get back into his old routine. When he returned to Gregory Heights Middle School, however, something had changed. All the talk in the hallways was about high school—girls, dances, sports. Being popular.

Life as Sam Lightner knew it was ending. All his classmates were obsessed with how they looked and how they fit in. But for Sam, the issues every young teen faces were magnified a thousandfold. He was moving out of the cocoon of familiarity that kept him among family and longtime classmates, who could see past the disfiguring mass he carried on his face. He was moving into a world of judgmental teen-agers and he would carry with him a terrible handicap, a face drastically shortchanged of its ability to reach others with a subtle expression, a slightly raised eyebrow, a flicker on the edge of his mouth. He was being cast among strangers who would turn away from his alien features so fast that they would miss the boy behind the mask.

Like all teens, Sam’s perception of how others saw him would determine how he saw himself.

And when strangers looked at Sam, they first fixated on the left side of his face, a swollen mass that looked like a pumpkin left in the fields after Halloween. His left ear was even more abnormal, a purple mass the size and shape of a pound of raw ground beef. His jaw, twisted. His teeth, crooked. His tongue, shoved to the side. His left eye, nearly swollen shut.

When he walked to school each morning, he stopped at the crosswalk on Northeast Sandy Boulevard and watched passengers in cars and buses stare at him. When he walked through the neighborhood, he heard laughter and comments.

Once, a neighbor boy led his friends over to Sam’s house and knocked on the front door so the others could see Sam’s face.

*   *   *

In late August, a thick envelope arrived in Dr.Jennifer Marler’s office. She noticed it was from a Dr. Tim Campbell, an unfamiliar name, and tossed it aside. At the end of the day, after a brutal round of surgery, clinics and lab research, she was about to head home to her husband and three children when she spotted the envelope.

She dropped into her chair, grabbed it, ripped it open along one end and dumped the contents onto her desk. She started with the medical report: Patient has lymphaticovenous malformation of the left side of face and neck. Condition was diagnosed prenatally. Involvement of the airway necessitated a tracheotomy. Difficulty swallowing necessitated a gastronomy tube. Malformation has grown to the point of orbitaldystopia. In all other areas of life, though, the patient has developed normally.

She remembered—the Portland boy.

She searched through the paperwork and foundseveral photos. She picked one up and held it between her fingers. The photograph haunted Marler.

The boy lay in a hospital bed, staring at the camera with pleading eyes. He looked like one of the children featured in ads aimed at raising money to help poor kids overseas.

Marler scanned the reports. The kid was on a morphine drip, diagnosed as clinically depressed.

Marler was 38 and had been a doctor for 11 years. Outside of a textbook, she had never come across such a profound facial deformity. He was the saddest-looking child she’d ever seen.

And she had seen many. A score of photographs hang on her office wall, the faces of children who have set the course of Jennifer Marler’s life. Some of the images show children she successfully operated on, relieving them of the deformities that robbed them of their futures. Others tell sadder stories, reminding her of children who died from their abnormalities or who took the risk of surgery and didn’t survive.

Marler picked up the telephone and spoke with the nurse who scheduled weekly team conferences for the Vascular Anomalies Team. During the meeting, doctors discuss cases and decide whether they want to tackle them. The nurse said the next chance to present a case would be Sept. 22, 1999, just three weeks away.

She decided she’d present Sam Lightner’s case and argue that he be brought to Boston. First, though, she had to get the facts down cold. She picked up the telephone again, called her husband, apologized and told him to have dinner without her. She talked to her three young daughters and told them Mommy had something important to do.

*   *   *

The team met Wednesday evenings in the surgical library. Members, fellows and residents gathered around a 15-foot-long oak table, nibbling cookies and sipping soft drinks.

Everyone found a seat, the lights dimmed and the patients’ images appeared, one by one, on an overhead screen. The team members flipped through paperwork, scanning each patient’s medical history. They spoke in short, clipped sentences, rife with medical jargon, challenging one another, looking for potential problems that might rule out surgery.

Marler remembers studying the paper in front of her. Nineteen children were up for consideration. Fewer than half would be chosen.

The team moved quickly: The agenda included an 8-month-old girl from Argentina. A 3-year-old girl from Italy. A 9-year-old boy from Minnesota.

Sam Lightner was next. His picture—the one Dr. Tim Campbell had taken—flashed on the screen.

“Who is he?” someone asked.

Marler recalls choosing her words carefully. She wanted to make sure the team knew something of the boy’s life. He was in pain, she says she told them. Without hope. The disfigurement severe.

Although the center takes some of the most difficult cases in the world, Marler knew Sam Lightner presented major problems.

Behind her, she heard papers rustle as the team read his medical history. They quickly zeroed in on those risks. They hesitated. Before making any decision, the team members wanted more information.

Next case.

Marler scheduled Sam for the Nov. 3, 1999, meeting. Again the answer was no.

At the Nov. 10 meeting, she tried again, focusing not on the entire team, but on Dr. John Mulliken, the surgeon who directs the Vascular Anomalies Team and a researcher who’s trying to figure out the causes of defects such as Sam’s. Mulliken lectures at hospitals around the world and co-founded the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. He’s written 185 scientific articles, 40 book chapters and two complete books.

The way Marler saw it, a team of doctors would have to operate on Sam. And Marler wanted to be on the team.

At this meeting, she spent an unusual 30 minutes arguing her case, knowing this was her last chance. She studied Mulliken, an impatient man, as he reviewed the files. She knew what he was thinking—the horrendous bleeding, and the tangle of nerves in the mass. If Mulliken damaged one, the boy might lose the ability to speak, to close his left eye or to smile.

She appealed to Mulliken’s pride and compassion. No other surgeons, Marler remembers telling him, believe they can fix this.

She watched Mulliken, Sam’s last hope.

The projector’s motor hummed. Sam Lightner’s face peered out into the room. Mulliken looked up at that face.

Bring him to Boston, he said.

*   *   *

Sam, on his first commercial airline flight, checks out a map and discusses it with his mom while their MD-80 carries them across the country to Boston, where Sam will meet the surgeons at Children’s Hospital.

The visit to Children’s Hospital includes a long round of appointments with different doctors In one waiting room, Sam entertains himself by spinning in an office chair while his parents mark the hours.

On April 7, 2000, Sam Lightner and his parents walked three blocks from their Boston hotel to Children’s Hospital. The Lightners silently rode an elevator to the third floor, where a smiling receptionist waved them over and took the Lightner file. Sam found a seat and flipped through a stack of magazines. He caught the eye of a woman sitting across from him. She turned away. Sam saw her whisper something to a woman sitting next to her before both turned back to stare.

“Samuel Lightner,” the receptionist called.

A woman led them down a hallway to an examination room. Sam climbed onto the table. A few minutes later, the Lightners heard a soft knock.

She stood 5 feet 7 inches tall and wore a white doctor’s smock over a long black skirt with matching black hose and shoes. Her brown hair was cut in a pageboy. “I’m Dr. Marler,” she said.

She sat down on a doctor’s stool, tugged on her glasses and fiddled with a string of pearls that lay across her white and blue-striped blouse. “I’m so glad to meet you,” she told Sam. A flush spread up his neck.

Debbie Lightner dug through her purse and handed Marler a picture taken shortly after Sam’s premature birth. Marler stared at the image of the tiny infant. “Boy,” she said, “you were a little peanut.”

The Lightners explained Sam’s medical history—the emergency surgery right after his birth, the ear surgery that led to six weeks of persistent bleeding and the reluctance of other surgeons to even attempt cutting away the main mass of tissue. Marler took notes, interrupting occasionally to ask a question or to look at additional photos.

“I think you’re in the right place,” she continued. “Dr. Mulliken is both a craniofacial surgeon and a specialist in vascular anomalies. That makes him the right man for the job.” She swiveled to face the examination table.

“So let’s take a look, Sam.” She patted his knee. He smiled.

“What grade are you in now?”

“Eighth,” he said, in his raspy voice.

Marler ran her fingers across the mass, sizing it up. She sighed.

Sam’s father cleared his throat. “He’s going into the ninth grade,” David Lightner said. “He wants the size of his head made smaller. He’s a little bit more concerned about his appearance now.” Marler patted Sam on the shoulder. “I can understand that, Sam,” she said. “I’ll bring in Dr. Mulliken and our cast of thousands. On this one, we’re going to need everyone’s opinion.”

She walked out, closing the door after her.

“You’ve been waiting for this a long time, haven’t you, Sam?” Debbie Lightner asked her son.

“Nervous?” his father asked.

“I’m just hoping.”

The door opened, and Marler walked back in, followed by six doctors who formed a semicircle around Sam. A man wearing a bow tie with blue and red polka dots stepped forward.

“Hi, Sam. I’m Dr. Mulliken. Nice to see you.”

He perched on the examination table next to Sam. He took the boy’s head in his hands as if holding a basketball and moved it gently, running his fingers from one side of the face to the other. He frowned. All the blue veins showing through Sam’s waxen skin worried him.

“Oh, boy,” he said. “There’s a lot of venous component there. This is an incredible overgrowth.”

He released Sam’s head and climbed off the examination table. He stepped back two feet and crossed his arms, looking like a sculptor studying a block of granite. He moved to the left. The semicircle moved with him. Back to the right. The other doctors shuffled into place.

Mulliken ran his hands over his face. He groaned.

Marler jumped in. “I think he has very good facial nerve function.”

“Smile, Sam,” Mulliken commanded.

He sighed again. “OK,” Mulliken said. “Let’s write down some things.”

That was what Marler had waited eight months to hear. She smiled, sat on a stool and opened her notebook, ready to send off instructions on what Mulliken needed to know about the inside of Sam Lightner’s head.

“I want Reza to look down the trach and see what’s going on there,” Mulliken said, asking one of his colleagues to peer down Sam’s airway. “Send him to AP for a Panorex. Find a CP and get pictures downstairs. We’re going to have to decide what’s going on in terms of flow, and if there’s anything we can do to make it easier.” He looked at Marler.

“Got all that?”

“Right,” Marler said.

Mulliken boosted himself back onto the exam table. He scooted up next to Sam as if he were the boy’s grandfather. He put his hand on Sam’s knee.

“What bothers you the most?” he asked. “If you had one thing you wanted, what would that be?”

Sam shrugged. He stared at his hands, folded in his lap.

“Should I give you some choices?” Mulliken asked. “Some multiple choices?”

Sam responded with a barely perceptible nod.

“Our goal will be to make you look as symmetrical as possible, to balance out your face,” he said. “A Picasso is a great painting, but no one wants to walk around with one for a face. We have many things to talk about: Making your ear smaller, the tongue movement, the eye. The neck’s pretty good.”

He put his arm around Sam’s shoulder. “What do you want, Sam?” he asked quietly, as if the room were empty except for the two of them.

Sam bowed his head and stared at his hands.

“Well, you’re really down to the choice of two things,” Mulliken said. “We can focus on the face or the ear, but we can’t do both at the same time. If we get the face smaller, the ear will look bigger. Frankly, I just don’t know. The face is tough, very tough. Lord, I just can’t imagine…”

Sam raised his head. He looked deeply into Mulliken’s face with his one good eye. “I want to fit in,” he said in his raspy whisper. “I want to look better.”

Mulliken nodded, his features softening. He pulled the boy a little closer. “I can understand, Sam.”

David Lightner, standing against the back wall, pushed his way through the semicircle until he faced Mulliken, who dropped his arm from Sam’s shoulders and faced the father. “His goal?” Lightner said. “Well, Sam’s 14 years old. Like you put it, he’d like a more symmetrical face. I’m ambivalent. I understand the risk of the whole thing. But this is something Sam wants. We’re supporting him.”

“OK, Dad,” Mulliken said. Then he swiveled on the table and faced the doctors.

“I think it will be reasonable to focus on this huge area on the side of his face,” Mulliken said. “It’s no-man’s land, and it will be hard to work in that area. The problem’s going to be finding the facial nerve branches and separating them from the malformation. They look exactly alike.”

Mulliken slid off the table and paced. He shook his head, as if he were having an argument with himself. “The bleeding. Boy! When you are dealing with a pure lymphatic tissue malformation, bleeding is just an annoyance. But if you have these venous components, which he has, it’s more than a problem.”

He smiled. “But Sam, I’m going to try.”

The goal, Mulliken told the room, was to get the mass on the side of Sam’s face down to the bone. If Mulliken could eliminate the mass, Sam could return to the hospital for more surgery to reshape the bone. That surgery would be much easier.

Dr. Jennifer Marler (left) acted as Sam’s persistent advocate, urging her colleagues to bring him to Boston. There, Dr. John Mulliken got his first look at the Portland boy.

“Another operation?” Debbie Lightner asked. “The insurance company’s going to really love us.”

Mulliken broke through the semicircle and stopped in front of her. “Listen,” he said, “you show that insurance company photographs of this boy and there won’t be a dry eye in the house.”

The Lightners looked at each other.

Mulliken moved aside so they could look at Sam.

“Sam?” his father asked.

Sam nodded, more firmly this time.

Mulliken moved back to his patient. “This is going to be tough. We’re in for a rough time in the operating room. It’s going to be a microscopic dissection, and we’re going to need a team.”

He looked around the room. “Dr. Marler, me and one or two others.”

He stepped back once more to look at Sam. “His face is going to be swollen for a long time,” Mulliken said. “By the time he goes to school, though, he should look considerably better. Push me to the wall, and I’d like to think we could make it 50 percent better.”

“Sam,” he asked, “is this something you really want?” Sam nodded. Mulliken patted the boy on the shoulder.

“Let’s schedule for July,” he told Marler.

Sam’s father cleared his throat. “From seeing him in person, is this something you want to do?”

3-D CAT scans revealed the extent of the bone deformity that lies beneath the tissue mass on Sam’s face. The shape of the bone means that Sam’s image will remain distorted even if the tissue mass is removed, although surgeons think they can straighten the bone in a later—and much simpler—operation.

Mulliken frowned. “Well …”

“I’m being blunt,” David said. “We have to know.”

Mulliken sat on the exam table again. “I don’t know if ’want’ is quite the right word,” he said quietly. “I think that we can do it.”

He ran his hands over his face. “I know we can do it,” he said. “I wish I could make him perfect. All plastic surgeons search for perfection, just like Michelangelo. I can’t give him perfection.”

He hoped he could remove a large amount of tissue from the side of Sam’s face. But he also knew the underlying bone would remain seriously misshapen. When the world looked at Sam after the first surgery, it would still see an extraordinary deformity. But removing the tissue was the necessary first step to dealing with the bone.

“Dad, I’m bothered that he has to live with this mass,” Mulliken said. “Everyone should have the right to look human.”

*   *   *

Doctors worry about the nerve function in Sam’s face, and they check carefully to see how his deformity has affected his ability to feel and move.

The giddiness the Lightners felt vanished almost as soon as the jet roared down the runway at Logan International Airport and headed west, back to Portland, back to reality. Once home, David and Debbie went back to work, and Sam returned to eighth grade.

Sam’s mother took Sam to register at Grant High School. An administrator walked in, noticed the Lightners sitting outside the counselors’ office and stopped. He introduced himself and shook Sam’s hand. He turned away from the boy, as if Sam were deaf. He told Debbie that Grant had a great special-education class for mentally retarded students.

Her son, he said, would love it.

*   *   *

The telephone rang in the Lightner home. Dr. Jennifer Marler told Debbie Lightner that surgery was scheduled for July 6. Having a date, something to put on the calendar, made it real. And frightening.

After dinner, the Lightners called their children together. Sam sat at one end of the dining-room table, his father at the other. In between were Debbie, Emily, 12, and Nathan, 9. The family cat, Alice, jumped onto the table.

David Lightner played with a pencil, turning it end over end. “I wanted to discuss how this is going to affect us,” he said. “We’re up in the air about whether we should do it. Mommy talked with Dr. Marler for quite a while. There are dangers, but Dr. Marler said if Sam was her child, Dr. Mulliken would be the man.”

David fiddled with a magazine. “There are some things that could happen,” he said. “We have to be honest about that.”

“Like what?” Nathan asked.

“If some of the nerves are damaged, Sam’s face could droop,” his mother said. “He’d be paralyzed on that side.”

“You mean he wouldn’t feel it?” Emily asked.

“Right.”

No one looked at Sam.

“He might bleed a lot during surgery,” his mother said. “They think they can control it, but you never know. I think Dad just wanted to have it all out on the table for everyone to talk about one last time.”

David Lightner shifted in his chair.

“Now that we’re 3,000 miles away,” he said, “it puts a different spin on it. It’s more complicated sitting here.”

Debbie touched Sam’s arm. “Sam, do you still want to do this?”

Sam nodded.

“I want to hear it.”

“Yes,” Sam said, firmly.

“It’s your decision,” his father said. “That’s the deal. If I felt something was wrong, I’d intervene. I don’t sense that. But I have to be honest, it scares me a little bit.”

“Me, too,” Nathan said.

“Me, too,” Emily said.

“I worry about the potential damage to him,” said David. “As it stands, he’s Sam. He is who he is.”

“He’ll look different,” Emily said. “Sam is Sam.”

“He is who he is,” said David. “We don’t think anything’s wrong with him.”

David leaned forward, arms on the table, and stared across at his son. “Any doubts, Sam?” he asked. “If you say ’no,’ we call and cancel right now, date or no date.”

“I’m a little nervous,” Sam said. “But I like the doctors.”

“Well, it scares me,” his father said. “It’s the unknown. Here we have the situation that Sam deals with. It’s the known. It’s not ideal for him because of his face. His face freaks people out. But it’s a known property. And it’s a little bit scary to risk everything because the world doesn’t accept his face.”

“Dad, I’m sure,” Sam said. “Look what happened at Grant.”

His father bowed his head.

“That’s what people think about him,” Debbie said. “They think he’s mentally defective.”

Sam leaned forward and mustered all his strength.

“I want to do this,” he said.

David placed both hands on the table.

“We are fearfully and wonderfully made,” he told his family. “And very fragile.”

He sighed.

“All right,” he said. “It’s a go.”

The Boy Behind the Mask

Tom Hallman Jr.

Photos by Benjamin Brink
The Oregonian   October 3, 2000, Part 3

The risks we take can tell us who we are

A nurse appears in the doorway. It’s time to go, she says. Sam Lightner takes a deep breath and nods feebly. He lifts himself, his hands trembling slightly on the arms of the chair, and walks across the small pre-op waiting room to give his parents a hug.

“We love you, sweetie,” says his mother. She pulls him close and kisses him softly on his left cheek, right on the mass that the waiting team of doctors will target. Sam looks at his mother through his right eye—the only truly normal feature on his face. He blinks it once. A wink.

“Have a nice sleep,” says his father as he gives his son a hearty pat on his shoulder.

David Lightner wraps his arms around his son as a nurse waits to walk Sam down the hallway toward the operating room.

The nurse touches the 14-year-old on the shoulder and leads him down the hallway. His gown hangs loosely on his 83 pounds, exposing his spindly legs. In another room, nurses help him onto an operating table. He lies down, and a nurse inserts an IV line into an arm. Then she injects drugs to make him drowsy. When his eyes flutter, he’s wheeled into Operating Room 16.

It is Thursday, July 6, 2000, just three months since Sam and his parents visited Boston to find out if this elite surgical team, the only one in the world with any chance of correcting his deformity, would take his case.

The room is about the size of a two-car garage with a 15-foot ceiling. It’s chilled to 64 degrees, which cuts down on the growth of germs and keeps the doctors comfortable as they work. Two massive operating lights, each with four bulbs, hang over the table. Everything but the white walls—the drapes that cover the patient and the operating table, the surgical scrubs and the shoe covers—is light blue.

“You’re just falling asleep now, Sam,” says a nurse as she strokes his hair. “Just falling asleep, Sam.”

His eyes close.

An anesthesiologist takes her place behind the bank of machines that will control the boy’s body during the operation. She switches a knob, and the sound of a pump fills the room. It is a steady beat—one swoosh every two seconds—and fills Sam’s lungs with air, breathing for the unconscious boy.

The circulating nurse, responsible for everything that comes in and out of the room, sorts through a cluttered desk to find Sam’s medical history. In these final quiet moments, she sits on a corner stool and flips through a folder the size of a small telephone book, reading about this small boy’s long journey. The nurse puts the file down and walks to the operating table. An intravenous line pumps Sam’s body full of saline, a way of making up blood volume in the face of the bleeding that is sure to follow.

A member of the medical team comforts Sam as he lies on a gurney, drifting off into anesthetic sleep in the moments before the surgery begins.

The swinging door to the scrub room opens with a bang, and Dr. Jennifer Marler enters Operating Room 16. Her arms drip with water. The circulating nurse hands her a sterilized towel.

Marler, a 38-year-old mother of three, lobbied to bring Sam here to Boston, to Children’s Hospital, the nation’s largest pediatric medical center. In late 1999, Marler presented and pressed Sam’s case before the hospital’s Vascular Anomalies Team. The team members balked—the surgery was tremendously risky. But eventually Marler won them over.

The goal was to cut away a mass on the left side of the boy’s face. If all goes well, that will set the stage for a later operation on the misshapen bones in his face. But first, surgeons must cut their way down to the facial bone.

A nurse helps Marler into her surgical gown and a set of gloves. She moves to the operating table. She runs her hands across Sam’s face, gently, almost caressing the boy, not as a doctor but as a mother.

“We’ll take good care of you, Sam.”

She leans over his body and begins suturing his eyelids. She does not want his eyes to open during surgery—the swirl of scalpels, needles and surgical gowns around his face could scratch a cornea.

Word about Sam and the impending operation has filtered through the hospital, Harvard Medical School’s primary pediatric teaching hospital. The staff is curious about something that pushes the boundaries of medical practice.

A nurse from Operating Room 17 pops in. “Wow,” she says. “How old is he?”

“Fourteen,” says Marler.

“Where’s he from?”

“Oregon.”

“Does he go to school?”

“He does,” says Marler. “He’s very personable.””

As Marler begins preparing Sam’s face, the scrub doors swing open, and Dr. John Mulliken, the surgeon who will lead the team, strides silently into the room. He stops to study Sam’s three-dimensional CAT scans, which hang from a lighted viewing board. He has never encountered so complex a case.

He holds out his hands. A nurse helps him into his gown and gloves. He walks to the operating table and looks at his patient. “Good preparation,” he tells Marler. “Good preparation.”

Surgery is Mulliken’s life. He works weekends. He hasn’t had a vacation in years. He’s never married and has no children. He dotes on his dog, Girlie, and his cat, Felicia. A cabinet in the operating room carries 19 photographs of the two pets.

During surgery Mulliken can be gruff, and some of the rotating nurses have complained to the administration that he barked at them when they didn’t move quickly enough or when they handed him instruments he didn’t consider clean. But for this operation, Mulliken has assembled a team of people who have worked with him for years. They all have thick skins.

He reaches down and grabs Sam’s head with both hands. “His head’s just so big,” he mutters. “It just rolls around.”

He turns to a nurse. “I can’t have it rolling,” he says. “Stop it.”

The nurse scurries through the room, searching in cabinets until she finds something that looks like a doughnut the size of a dinner plate. Sam’s head fits in the hole. Mulliken tries moving the head. It doesn’t budge. “Good,” he says.

The swinging doors open again. Dr. Gary Rogers joins Mulliken at the head of the operating table. The blue surgical scrubs cover their bodies. The caps fit snugly over their heads. Masks hide their mouths and noses. Each wears special black glasses outfitted with surgical microscopes that will allow them to peer deep into the boy lying in front of them.

Mulliken ignores his teammates. He walks around Sam’s head, studying it from all angles. Knowing this would be a difficult operation, he had scheduled a warm-up earlier in the morning: repairing a cleft palate in an infant. His hands are limber and steady.

The surgical nurse makes the final adjustments to tool-lined trays beside her. The circulating room nurse awaits her first order. Mulliken, Rogers and Marler adjust the microscopes over their eyes. Mulliken points to a spot near Sam’s left ear. That, he says, is where he wants to make the first cut.

“Everyone agree?”

Marler and Rogers bend over Sam. “Yes,” they say in unison.

Mulliken takes a deep breath. “OK,” he says.

He holds out his right hand and asks for a scalpel. He grasps it firmly. “This is going to be a bear,” he says. “Let’s do it.”

The scalpel parts the skin, and the flesh gives way to the blade.

Then the blood begins to flow.

*   *   *

Bathed in the intense glow of the operating-room lights, Dr. John Mulliken (left) and Dr. Jennifer Marler (right) struggle to find the facial nerves hidden in the mass of tissue they are trying to remove from Sam’s face.

The first drop of blood lands on the floor, and Mulliken calls for suctioning. Marler uses a tool attached to a clear plastic tube. In seconds, it resembles a piece of red licorice that snakes across Sam’s body, down the floor and to a holding tank where the boy’s blood collects.

Rogers holds back the skin, allowing Mulliken to proceed. After 15 minutes, the lead surgeon has opened up a 3-inch incision. The bleeding hasn’t slowed.

He calls for a syringe. Marler injects more drugs designed to speed clotting into Sam’s neck, hoping they will slow the bleeding.

The team waits. The blood flows freely.

The team confers. Mulliken could close up now, suture the incision and end the operation. When the Lightner family traveled to Boston three months earlier to meet Mulliken and Marler, Mulliken made it clear that this surgery was risky. The only other time Mulliken tackled a case this serious, he made an incision, encountered massive bleeding and closed.

If he continues, he and his team will have to work furiously, trying to stay one step ahead of massive bleeding while they peel back the skin. And even if they expose the mass, they might never find the nerves that branch out into the tissue. If they cut a nerve, they could paralyze the left side of Sam’s face.

The tissue mass is a jumble of skin, tissue, nerves, lymphatic vessels, veins and arteries. A Nerf ball filled with blood and fluid. Mulliken has no road map. If he plunges ahead, it will be like replumbing a house with the water turned on.

Operating Room 16 awaits his decision.

He leans over Sam’s body. “Let’s do it,” he finally says.

The circulating nurse jumps from her chair and hustles to a phone. She punches in the four-digit number to the hospital’s blood bank. Six units of blood are now in a cooler in Operating Room 16. The nurse tells the bank to set aside an additional six. Even if all goes well, Sam will bleed so much during the operation that she will have to replace his entire blood supply.

She glances to a plastic bag holding a unit of blood that drips from an IV line into Sam’s right arm. The bag is half-empty.

Mulliken lengthens the incision. The bag drains.

Mulliken, Marler and Rogers operate quickly, the suctioning line thick with the boy’s blood. Each time the scalpel moves, it slices a blood vessel. They go through 50 surgical towels and countless sponges, soaking up blood so they can see where they are.

Mulliken calls for the Bovie, a machine that electrically cauterizes blood vessels. In a normal body, the machine stops bleeding, and the surgery is almost bloodless. Marler leans over Sam’s body and grasps the Bovie, a device that looks like a dental drill, in her right hand.

There is the sound of sizzling, as if grease has been dropped onto a grill. A plume of smoke rises from Sam’s face. But the bleeding continues.

A nurse walks behind the surgical team and hangs a third bag of blood on the IV line. “Jesus Christ,” Mulliken mutters.

The team begins to pull back the skin. They can see the edge of the mass. “Easy,” Mulliken tells Marler. “Easy.”

The side of the boy’s face oozes blood. Drops splatter the floor. A red stain spreads through the surgical drape as if someone had spilled a glass of wine on a white tablecloth. Nurses call for another 10 towels. Within minutes, they are soaked through, and the nurses dump them into a bucket.

The insides of Marler’s shoes are soaked with Sam’s blood. She asks for a new pair of wool socks.

Mulliken sees only one option: They’re going to have to stitch each blood vessel closed. He calls for needles.

While Marler continues cutting, Rogers uses the Bovie, and Mulliken starts stitching. The surgical nurse goes through packet after packet of stitches and tells the circulating room nurse she needs more.

Mulliken’s fingers tire, and Marler takes over. Then Rogers. The bleeding slows to a trickle. The team has tied more than 200 stitches.

Slowly, they pull Sam’s skin back and cover it with a towel to keep it moist.

The mass is exposed.

Mulliken looks to a board in the far corner of Operating Room 16. Sam has gone through three units of blood. And the team hasn’t even reached the heart of the operation. He steps away from the table. He tells Marler and Rogers to clean up the area surrounding the mass. He’s going to take a break.

The phone rings, and the circulating nurse answers it. “We’re No. 1 again,” she calls out to the room.

For the past 10 years, U.S. News and World Report magazine has ranked Children’s Hospital best in the country. It’s won the award again.

“Your friend says you had a bet with him,” she tells Mulliken. “He says you owe him a dinner. He wants lobster.”

Mulliken strolls toward the door. “Yeah, yeah, yeah,” he says, disappearing through the swinging doors.

*   *   *

Surgical coverings hide Sam’s body and most of his face, leaving only the tissue mass exposed under the glare of the surgical lights. It looks like a piece of raw prime rib.

Even to someone as experienced as Mulliken, the mass is a mystery. X-rays don’t show soft tissue. So there’s no way of knowing how invasive the mass is or what it’s wrapped around. A single nerve leaves the brain and divides into five branches that spread out to control the side of the face. But the mass could rest on top of nerves, or it could spread under them. Or the nerves could snake right through it.

The boy has few enough pathways to connect him with the rest of the world. If Mulliken guesses wrong and cuts a nerve, Sam loses an important part of what he has left—the ability to blink his eye, to crinkle his forehead or to smile.

News of what’s going on in Operating Room 16 has spread throughout the third floor. Residents and other doctors wander in to look at the CAT scans hanging on the wall. They stand back and stare at the mass, bloody and glistening in the high-powered lights.

“Unbelievable,” says a visiting doctor.

He turns to the circulating nurse. “How old is he?”

“Fourteen,” she says. “And he’s really nice.”

The doctor looks at scans, which make Sam look like a cyborg in a science-fiction movie.

“Isn’t that the saddest thing you’ve ever seen?” he asks. “It’s heartbreaking. This kid must have a tough life. That’s no way to live.”

On the way out of the room, he passes Mulliken, who re-enters Operating Room 16 with a shout. “Children’s Hospital is tops,” he says. “We’re No. 1.” Even through his surgical mask it’s clear he is frowning.

“I was hoping we would be second or third,” he announces. “That way we won’t be so damn complacent around here.”

He checks with Marler. The blood has slowed to a trickle.

His job now will be to hunt for the nerve branches and to cut away the mass of tissue. The team will use an electric probe. If they touch a nerve, a portion of Sam’s face will twitch.

Out of habit the circulating nurse pulls down a thick anatomy book. She turns to the page that details the facial nerves and leaves it open on a table so the team can refer to it. But it will do them no good. In this section of Sam’s body, nothing is where it should be.

The team works under microscopes. Looking for the nerve will be like hunting for a white rope encased in white concrete.

Test. Cut. Test. Cut.

They begin removing bits of the mass. The bleeding begins again.

An hour passes, and Mulliken goes to the scrub room. He takes off his gown and gloves, and returns to flop in a chair away from the operating table. The pressure is intense, physically and mentally, and the team plans on working shifts—when one surgeon tires another will take the scalpel. Mulliken leans back and rests his head on a cabinet. He closes his eyes. After 15 minutes, he stirs.

“How’s it going,” he calls to Marler.

“The nerve must be surrounded by scars from his previous surgery,” she says.

“Don’t relax,” he tells her. He knows the biggest danger is in getting sloppy and cutting something that appears to be tissue but may in fact be the edge of a hidden nerve.

“Jennifer, are you looking?”

“There’s nothing,” she tells him.

He leaves the room to scrub and to check on his cleft-palate patient. He returns 30 minutes later. About four and a half hours have passed since the surgery began.

“How you guys doing?” he yells when he enters Operating Room 16. The silence is ominous. After getting in his gown and gloves, he moves to Marler’s side. He looks over her shoulder.

“Is this the same case?” he jokes.

“Hey,” she admonishes him with a chuckle.

“You found it yet?”

“We think we found the region.”

“I know the region,” he says. “I want the nerve. Where is it?”

He takes over, and Marler strips off her gown. She is going to take a shower, get something to eat and call her family and tell them she won’t be home until late that night.

Test. Cut. Test. Cut.

A nurse walks behind the surgical team and hooks up a fourth unit of blood to Sam’s IV line. Marler returns 20 minutes after leaving and finds Mulliken frustrated and worried. They haven’t found any branches of the main nerve, and the operation is entering its fifth hour.

And the kid is bleeding. He thinks of Dr. Alan Seyfer, the Portland surgeon who nearly attempted a similar operation on Sam when the boy was 12, and then decided the risks were simply too great.

“Seyfer was right,” Mulliken grumbles. “Seyfer was right.”

He mops up more blood and turns to see that the fourth unit is nearly gone. “This was a mistake to take this case,” he says. “I don’t think we can help this boy.”

Mulliken tells his team there are two choices: Increase the risk of destroying part of the nerve by cutting even faster. Or close up.

“I’ve been here before,” he says. “I think we should close up.”

Marler turns to him. “Let’s keep going.”

Mulliken moves to the side. “Jennifer,” he snaps, “you take over. You wanted to bring him here; you look for the nerve.”

Marler takes the probe, and 90 more minutes pass. The team has gone through more than 200 sponges and towels soaking up Sam’s blood. The holding tank where the suction line empties sloshes red.

“I think I got it,” Marler shouts.

“This is in a portion of scar tissue like you have never seen,” she tells Mulliken, who pats her on the back.

She applies the electric probe again, and a muscle twitches. “You got it?” Mulliken asks.

“I got it,” says Marler. “It’s all encapsulated. I can’t distinguish the nerve from the scar tissue. And it’s deeper than it should be. I’m afraid to dissect any farther.”

Mulliken trades places with her. He peers into the side of Sam’s face and holds out his right hand. A nurse hands him a scalpel. He leans over, inches from the mass. He touches it with the tip of his scalpel.

“Well, I can’t budge it from the scar tissue,” he says. “It is literally entangled in it.”

Marler uses the probe. Sam’s forehead moves.

“Every time I dissect, I’m worried,” Marler says. She and Mulliken turn away from Sam and look intently at each other.

“It’s bad,” he says. He peers back into the mass, which is oozing blood. He stands up.

“We’ve come this far,” he says. “We’ve got to get it out.””

Rogers assists with suctioning and controlling the bleeding so Mulliken can see where the nerve might lie.

“Let’s stimulate around what we think is the edge,” Mulliken says.

Test. Nothing. Test. Nothing. Test. Reaction.

Mulliken cuts. “It should be under here,” he says. “Jesus.”

He sighs. “I would go right here,” he says.

Mulliken, Marler and Rogers, instruments in each hand, all focus on a spot in the mass the size of a quarter. “I think I found a branch above,” Mulliken says.

The fourth bag of blood is nearly gone.

Mulliken turns to Marler and asks for the probe. He tries to work his way back up the tiny nerve he’s located, searching for the main branch.

He applies the probe again, but the room is silent.

“Come on, people,” he snaps. “Talk to me.”

“Yes,” says Marler. “His forehead moved.”

Mulliken tries again. They are more than six hours into the operation.

“Bingo,” says Mulliken.

*   *   *

The surgery has dragged on for hours with little progress, and Mulliken, taking a breather next to an array of Sam’s CAT scans, is feeling the frustration and exhaustion.

Darkness has fallen and more the 10 hours of surgery have already passed as David and Debbie Lightner doze in the empty waiting room.

The team moves out from the nerve they’ve located, hunting for other branches. “We have to see it, to get around it,” Mulliken says. “The nerve is going right through this mass.”

Marler turns to him. “Just imagine what it’s going to be like getting there,” she says. “What are we going to do?” Mulliken says nothing.

“Could we get the malformation off and then go back and do a nerve graft?” she asks.

“No,” he says. “We can’t even find all the nerves. Jesus Christ,” he says. “We’ve been here nearly seven hours, and we can’t even get to the nerves.”

Rogers strips off his gown and leaves the room for a break. Mulliken and Marler bend over Sam. Suddenly, blood spurts onto Marler’s blue gown. The scalpel has nicked a branch of the carotid artery.

“Bleeder,” Mulliken yells, calling for clamps and sutures to stanch the spurting blood. The surgical nurse doesn’t move fast enough for him. “Come on,” he shouts. “Come on.”

He works frantically. “We got a real bleeder here,” Mulliken yells. “Oh, Jesus.”

The fourth bag of blood is gone. A nurse scurries to hang a fifth, which drains as though it has a hole in it. A sixth bag begins to empty just as fast.

The blood loss could send Sam Lightner into cardiac arrest. He is close to death.

Mulliken leans into Sam’s body, violently shifting the head, stitching and then reaching out to grab another instrument and stitching again. The bleeding slows.

Rogers returns. “What’s up?” he asks.

“We get into the carotid branch of the vessel, and you walk off?” Mulliken says.

Rogers, mystified, looks at Marler.

“We’re fine,” she says. “We’re fine.”

*   *   *

The hallway outside Operating Room 16 empties. It’s 10:30 p.m., and janitors are already cleaning the surrounding rooms, readying them for the next day’s cases. In all of Children’s Hospital, only one surgery continues—the one in Operating Room 16.

The members of the team have to get reoriented. They suction off the blood and begin testing, looking for nerves again. Mulliken probes. “Let’s get going here,” he says. “We’re losing time.”

He asks the surgical nurse for a tool covered with green dye and maps the nerve branches right on the exposed tissue. The team can cut anything in between the green lines. When they reach the edge, they must test, getting as close to the nerve as possible. They think they’ve found all the nerves, but they won’t be sure until Sam regains consciousness and actually tries to move.

They begin cutting.

Small pieces, the size of a toenail clipping. Then much larger, some of them size of a marble. “Say,” Mulliken says. “You know that we’re the No. 1 hospital in the country?” He chuckles.

Nurses and doctors laugh.

“You know what we are doing now?” he asks. “We’re rolling, rolling, rolling.” He sings lines from the theme to the old television show “Rawhide.” And hacks away at the mass.

“You ever see anything like this?” one nurse asks another.

Marler dissects the area under Sam’s chin. “That should go,” she says as she pulls out a large chunk. “Let’s go the extra mile.”

Mulliken pulls the flap of skin back over Sam’s face. “He looks a lot better,” he says.

He folds the flap back down. “Folks,” he says, “We’re down to the bone.”

*   *   *

Sam’s blood has completely lost the ability to clot, and the nurse rushes to replenish it with a seventh bag. “He’s bleeding from every little hole,” Mulliken says. “Jesus Christ, things are starting to blow up. We’re getting out of here.”

He stands to speak to the room. “Close,” he says.

Rogers and Marler stitch Sam’s skin flap back to the side of his face. “That chin of his is going to look awesome,” Marler says. “Not a bad way to start high school,” says Mulliken. He steps away from the table, taking off his gloves, gown and mask. He sits at a table and fills out forms. He glances at a wall clock to note the time.

It is midnight. The surgery has lasted nearly 13 hours.

He files the paperwork and walks out the door and down the empty hallways. Through another set of doors and then into the bowels of the hospital. In the waiting room, he finds Sam’s parents asleep on separate sofas.

He clears his throat. They stir.

David and Debbie Lightner in the recovery area of the Intensive Care Unit, quietly examine the results of the surgery that has just ended. The post-surgical swelling is intense, and it’s hard to see how much progress the surgeons have made.

“Everything is fine,” he tells the Lightners. “All is well.”

“How difficult was it?” David asks.

Mulliken sits on a chair and runs his hands across his face.

“This was very difficult,” Mulliken says. “The most difficult surgery I’ve ever performed. At times we were very discouraged, and it wasn’t easy. But no one ever wanted to give up.”

He yawns. “All is well,” he says, rubbing the back of his neck. “The next step will be fixing the mandible bone, probably next summer. That won’t be a problem.”

The Lightners turn to each other. They hold hands.

“You know, doctor, when I talk with you, I realize how Sam’s face really looked,” David says, his voice breaking. “To me, to us, he’s always been just Sam. I guess we got used to it. To us, he’s just a kid with a big old head.”

Mulliken nods.

“The family doesn’t see it,” he says. “It’s the rest of the world, all of us, the strangers who can’t see beyond the face. That’s the sad part.”

The Lightners stand. They move toward Mulliken but hesitate, not sure of what to do or what to say.

“Thank you,” says Debbie Lightner. She runs her hand across her eyes.

Mulliken smiles. “You’re welcome,” he says.

He turns and disappears through the door.

The Boy Behind the Mask

Tom Hallman Jr.

Photos by Benjamin Brink
The Oregonian   October 4, 2000, Part 4

 “I am Sam, Sam I am”

The doors to Operating Room 16 opened with a bang, and two intensive-care nurses pushed Sam Lightner’s gurney into the hallway, maneuvered it to their left and toward an elevator.

Behind them, a nurse tossed bloody sponges and towels into a bucket on the floor. Another nurse put the final touches on official reports, glancing at the wall clock to note that the boy was leaving the room just after 12:30 a.m. on July 7, 2000. Thirteen hours had passed since a highly specialized team of world-class surgeons had begun Sam’s operation on the morning of July 6.

A thick bandage—brilliant white except for a streak of red left by the blood still oozing through sutures on his neck—encased Sam’s head. An IV line pumped drugs and painkillers into his body. He was heavily sedated, not expected to stir for at least the next 36 hours.

Dr. Jennifer Marler, one of Sam’s three surgeons, pulled off her surgical gown and gloves. In her blue surgical scrubs, she hurried after the bed and pushed her way into the elevator. She wanted be next to Sam when he arrived in the Intensive Care Unit.

The elevator doors opened, and nurses wheeled Sam into a private room. Quickly they plugged lines running from his body into a bank of monitors. They adjusted the screens, and Marler motioned to the nurses. They followed her to the nurse’s station.

She opened Sam’s file and pulled out a color photograph taken in April, when Sam had first been evaluated at Boston’s Children’s Hospital. Sam, Marler explained, was a 14-year-old from Portland, Ore. He’d been born with a venous malformation—a bulging mass of blood vessels and tissue—on the left side of his face. And this, she said, is what he had looked like. She dropped the photograph on the counter. The nurses murmured.

Marler left the file on the counter and walked back into Sam’s room. The frail boy’s body barely filled the bed. His head had swelled to the size of a basketball, completely cloaking his features. Never, Marler told nurses checking on Sam, had she seen a head that big. Make sure it was always supported, she told them. If it somehow dropped off the bed, the weight could cause a spinal injury.

Marler wondered what Sam would look like when the swelling went down in a month. The goal had been to remove the tissue mass, setting the stage for a future surgery on the underlying bone. This first stage of his facial reconstruction might make Sam look 50 percent better, the surgeons figured.

But 50 percent improvement on a facial deformity such as Sam’s— the worst Marler had ever seen—still left a lot of work undone. And Sam was only 10 weeks from his first day at Portland’s Grant High School, a day when he would walk into a mob of judgmental adolescents who’d never seen him before.

Marler remembers standing over the boy’s bed and wondering: Was 50 percent enough?

*   *   *

When Sam wakes up after surgery, he can communicate only by pressing programmed keys on a small computer suspended in front of his face. He presses Button No. 1 to say, “I hurt.”

On Saturday, July 8, Sam Lightner stirred. His mother, hovering over him, called his name. He briefly opened his eyes before slipping back to sleep. Sam, unable to speak, was supposed to communicate with a small computer. Four responses—“I hurt,” “I need to go to the bathroom,” “yes” and “no”—had been preprogrammed. Sam had only to lift a finger and push one button to answer.

Debbie Lighter asked Sam how he felt.

Sam slowly raised a finger and punched button No. 1.

The pain, nurses told his mother, would be severe for at least three weeks. Even after he left the hospital, he would need painkillers.

That afternoon Marler showed up at the hospital. It was her day off, but she wanted to check on Sam. She recalls reminding herself, as she made her way to the ICU, to look confident, to hide her worry from the Lightners.

The surgery had been the most difficult operation of the lead surgeon’s career and one that had tested the entire team’s resolve. Sam’s anatomy was abnormal, the malformation just a jumble of tissue, blood vessels and nerves. Because X-rays don’t show soft tissue, the nerves lay concealed in the surrounding mass. Damaging a key nerve would have paralyzed the left side of Sam’s face. If that had happened, Sam would have lost the ability to blink his eye, to crinkle his forehead or to smile.

She checked in at the nurse’s station, received an update on Sam and then walked to his room.

She remembers the Lighters standing by the bed, looking at their son. A line from a ventilator—the machine was still breathing for Sam— was hooked into his tracheotomy, the hole in his throat that bypassed the tissue mass. The hole would remain until Sam completed all his surgeries.

Marler made small talk with the Lightners, wondering how she could check on Sam’s nerves. She felt good about the branches leading to his eye and forehead. But what about the branch to his mouth? That area had been hellish in Operating Room 16. She had to know, but Sam seemed to be sound asleep.

She asked if Sam had been awake at all. Yes, said Debbie, he’d woken up enough to stir when she spoke.

Can you make him smile? asked Marler. I need to see if he can smile.

Debbie Lightner leaned over Sam’s bed, moved her head closer to her son’s. Marler inched in right behind. His mother called to Sam.

The only sound in the room was the steady whoosh from the ventilator.

Marler saw the boy’s eyes flutter. Good sign. Try again, she told Debbie.

Sam, Debbie Lighter said, I need you to smile for me.

There was no response, and Debbie Lightner tried again. Sam, she said, smile.

Then, slowly, the outer edge of his mouth began to curl.

And Sam Lightner smiled.

*   *   *

Before Sam had his surgery he was measured for a mask that would fit over his head and help the left side of his face heat in the best possible position. It’s hot, it itches, and a lump in the fabric hurst. If it’s not cushioned Sam wears it reluctantly, and only when he sleeps.

Eight days after surgery, an internist walked into Sam’s room. The time had come to remove the bandages.

The surgeons who had operated on Sam had told the Lightners to be realistic. The unveiling would be anticlimactic, even disappointing. Sam’s face had taken a beating in the surgery. The buildup of internal fluids would make his face look more distorted than at any time in his life. For the next two months, he would wear an elastic mask each night to force his face into shape and to combat the swelling. The true results, they said, would be revealed in late September or early October.

Even so, Sam could hardly wait to see his new face. Later, he remembered the bandages coming off. The cool air on his face. The doctor backing away from the bed, and his mother moving in to help him.

He was unsteady, a colt learning to walk, and she guided him to the bathroom, to the mirror. The surgeons’ message played in his head— don’t get your hopes up. And then he looked at his reflection.

He focused first on the chin: It was rounder.

Then he examined the entire left side of his face: For the first time in more than a year, he could actually see his left ear, huge and distorted, because the tissue mass that had obscured the ear was gone.

Sam turned to his mother. He smiled, raised his hands to give her a thumbs-up sign. Then she led him back to bed.

Days later, doctors released Sam from the hospital, although they asked that he stay in Boston for several days so that he’d be close to the hospital if an infection set in. Painkillers made the days bearable; so he and his mother explored a museum and visited Fenway Park to see where the Boston Red Sox played.

Then, on July 19, the day before they were to fly home, he felt a lump on his chin.

He showed his mother. When she touched his chin, it hurt. She called the hospital. She was told to bring him right over.

She and Sam walked three blocks from their hotel, checked in and took a seat in the waiting room.

Dr. Jennifer Marler remembers that she was on her way to the laboratory when she spotted the Lightners sitting on a bench. She walked over and asked how they were doing. Debbie explained. Marler asked Sam how he felt. He couldn’t speak. He shrugged his shoulders. He cried.

Marler told them to wait there. She walked over to the receptionist, picked up the telephone, called the lab and canceled her appointment—she had something more important to take care of. She checked with the receptionist, found an empty examination room and collected the Lightners.

Once in the room, she turned the lights low to calm Sam. The mass under his chin, she explained, was not a growth but a buildup of fluid.

He was fine.

What she needed to do, she explained, was to drain the fluid. She administered a local anesthetic, and—while she waited for it to take effect—studied this boy who had dropped into her life 10 months before when a package and a plea for help from Tim Campbell, Sam’s Portland doctor, arrived in her office.

Their relationship had begun with a simple photograph, one Campbell had taken as a way to show the desperation of Sam’s situation. That photo had haunted Marler. It was the photo that led her to repeatedly petition the reluctant team of elite surgeons who would ultimately give in and bring Sam to Boston. It was that photo that would ultimately change his life … and hers.

But on this day in July, she was thinking of a different photo— the picture of a new Sam, a post-surgery Sam, that would join the gallery of photos on her office wall. There his face would appear among the 20 that most touched her during her medical career, the children—some dramatically transformed and some who failed to survive—who had come to her for help. After all she’d been through with this boy, one day Marler wanted to hang a picture of Sam on that wall.

She touched his chin. He did not flinch. She reached for a syringe to drain the fluid from his chin. She wanted to distract him when the needle pierced his skin.

Sam, she remembers saying as she jabbed him, I want you to promise to send me a photograph of you when you get home.

She finished her work, and they all moved to the door, ready to go their separate ways. Marler didn’t know what to say. And then she realized there was nothing to say. She spread her arms wide, pulling Sam close. She hugged him tightly, and tears rolled down her cheeks.

*   *   *

Debbie Lightner has been trimming Sam’s hair all his life. She spreads newspaper on the kitchen floor, places a chair on the paper and spritzes Sam’s hair with a plastic spray bottle.

The Frontier Airlines jet touched down in Portland on July 20th. Sam Lightner made his way up the aisle and into the crowded terminal. He saw his father, brother and sister carrying balloons reading: “Welcome Home.” They all hugged Sam and told him he looked good.

The surgery was behind in more ways than one. The family’s insurance company, negotiating directly with Children’s Hospital, had reached final resolution on the cost of the surgery. The grand total was $75,000.

It was time to celebrate.

But Sam felt listless. The skin that had been peeled back during surgery, which had been so healthy in Boston, was pale and waxy. His mother remembers feeling his forehead on the flight and thinking he was running a slight fever.

On July 25, the Lightners took Sam to see Dr. Tim Campbell, the pediatric surgeon who had operated on him when he was a day old, the doctor who had sent the plea for help to Jennifer Marler.

Sam shuffled into the waiting room, barely able to pick up his feet. He found the first chair, fell into it and leaned against the wall. He closed his eyes and curled his legs under him. A bead of sweat glistened on his forehead.

The receptionist called his name. With effort, he pushed himself out of the chair and followed her down the hallway to the examination room. His parents trailed behind. He climbed onto the examination table and let his head sag forward. His mother walked over and ran her hands through his brown hair.

The door opened and Campbell, in his light-green surgical scrubs, strolled in carrying Sam’s file.

“Sambo, you old dog,” he said. “How are you?”

Sam slumped against the wall.

“He’s not feeling well,” Debbie Lightner said. ““He had a fever of about 100 this morning. And he seems so tired. I don’t know if it’s from the trip home or what. But he just doesn’t seem himself.”

Campbell put the file down, washed his hands and walked over to the examination table. He leaned close to Sam.

“Sambo,” he said gently, “let me take a look at you.”

Sam raised his face.

“He looks a little swollen,” he said, “but that’s to be expected. Sam, how about lying down for me?” He ran his hands over Sam’s face, checked the file and then walked over and touched Sam’s forehead, feeling the tube the Boston surgeons had sutured under the boy’s scalp. “I think it’s time we take that drain tube out,” he said.

“Now this might hurt a bit, Sam,” Campbell said. “But it’s going to be over quickly.”

Sam tried to sit up, struggling, kicking his legs. “No,” he moaned. “No.”

His father held Sam’s legs. His mother moved to grasp his arms. Even so, he struggled and wiggled. Campbell yanked twice and drew out a clear line. “OK, big boy,” he said. “It’s over.”

Sam sat up, tears streaking his face.

“He’s lost 10 pounds,” Debbie Lightner said. “Some, I know, is from the surgery. But …”

Campbell asked if Sam was eating well, and when he heard that the boy’s appetite had lagged, he sighed.

“I think I’m going to put Sam in the hospital,” he said.

“No,” croaked Sam. “No. Please.”

Campbell patted Sam on the shoulder, kept his hand there and talked to Sam’s parents. “I want him in there for a day or two,” he said. “I want a blood culture, a blood count and I want him on IV antibiotics. I’m sure that blood count will be way off. I think he has an infection. We have too much invested here to take any risk.”

Sam sobbed, appalled that—after all the painful days he’d spent bedridden in Boston—he was headed back to the hospital.

“I know he’s not happy about it,” Campbell said. “I know he wants to go home. But he can get real sick, real fast. Those germs could spread through his body and cut off his windpipe. It could be life-threatening.”

Campbell patted Sam once on the shoulder. “I’m sorry, Sam,” he said. “I really am. Don’t give up, Sam. We’ll lick this.”

“At least we’re home,” David Lightner told his son.

“And it will only be a couple days,” Debbie Lightner added.

An attendant pushed Sam’s wheelchair across an atrium and into the main hospital building. A nurse poked at the boy with a needle while Sam cried and thrashed. She finally connected with a vein and started antibiotics flowing.

Sam checked into a hospital room and spent the next two days watching TV and reading magazines.

The swelling went down. His temperature dropped. And he started slipping out of bed to stroll the hospital halls, dragging his IV setup along with him.

Two days later, as Campbell had promised, Sam checked out of Emanuel and headed for the family home in Northeast Portland. When he got to the house, he looked in the bathroom mirror. With the swelling receding, the left side of his face was noticeably reduced. The bottom of his chin, once distended and pointed, was flat and smooth. Even his left eye, which the mass had pushed and distorted, seemed to be in a more normal position. His parents told him he looked great.

But …

When he scrutinized his face, looking at himself the way he knew strangers would, he realized that he didn’t look dramatically different from before the surgery.

The skin on the left side of his face, even though relieved of the huge mass of tissue that had once supported it, still formed a dome over the deformed bone underneath it. His jaw remained out of alignment, and it still distorted his mouth and teeth. Removing the tissue mass had further exposed his left ear, large, spongy and misshapen.

The surgeons would turn to all those problems the following spring. But in a month, on Aug. 24, 2000, the freshmen will register at Grant High School.

*   *   *

Even though the first round of his surgery is finished, Sam still has a tracheotomy that requires some special attention during the day. So he and his mother visit the school nurse a week before classes begin at Grant High School to work out the details of his care.

The boy sits on the living-room sofa, lost in his thoughts. His parents are at work. His younger brother and sister are enjoying the last two weeks of summer vacation. He moves through the house, looking at the clock, waiting for his mother to come home and take him to Grant.

Today he will register, officially joining the class of 2004. His sister asks him a question, but he ignores her. He has too many things on his mind.

He walks up to his bedroom, the one with the toy license plate on the door that reads “Sam.”

He hasn’t been back to Grant, Portland’s largest high school, for an official event since the open house on Feb. 3, 2000. That night, he joined more than 1,500 students and parents. He was nervous then.

And now …

He stands and checks out his shirt. Brand-new—pulled from his closet for the first time just for this day. He’s showered, and his hair is neatly combed. He walks downstairs and looks at himself in the mirror. He combs his hair again, carefully pressing the last stubborn strand into place.

He walks into the kitchen to make himself lunch. He opens the refrigerator door—glancing at the list of chores his parents expect him to do each day to earn his $5 weekly allowance. He’s thrown the dirty clothes down the chute to the basement. He’s cleaned the bathroom countertop and swept the floor. He’s picked up the basement and vacuumed the upstairs hallway.

He pulls out a jar of peanut butter and a jar of jam and makes himself a sandwich. His mother walks in the door as he’s finishing it up, and the phone rings. Three of Sam’s Gregory Heights Middle School classmates have gathered at a neighbor’s house and are calling to let him know they’re ready for their ride. Sam’s ready, too. He smoothes his shirt once more and reaches to touch his neck. But when he pulls his hand away, he sees blood on his finger.

Not today.

Not on this day.

Please.

“Mom.”

He points to his neck. Blood oozes from one of his stitches. He dabs at it with a napkin.

“Mom!”

His mother searches for a Band-Aid.

“No one will see this,” his mother says as she gently pushes the strip over the stitch. “Don’t worry.”

The two of them walk out the front door and climb into the family’s old Honda, back down the driveway, turn through tree-lined streets and pull up in front of a wood-frame house. Three strapping young men jump down the steps, move like athletes toward the Lightner car and jump into the back seat. Sam sits next to his mother in front. At 76 pounds, he looks like a little brother along for the ride.

Just as it did on orientation night, traffic clogs the streets around Grant. So Debbie Lightner has to park five blocks away. Sam and his friends step onto the sidewalk and walk through the neighborhood.

On that February evening nearly seven months before, darkness cloaked the long walk, and Sam covered the distance almost invisible to everyone gathering at Grant. Today, the sun shines brightly on streets filled with students.

Sam touches the Band-Aid on his neck. He adjusts his shirt collar, trying to hide it, but nothing works.

He walks on, his pals towering over him. With Grant looming in the distance, all of them grow quiet. The group spreads out as the boys climb the front steps. They head for separate metal doors.

Sam pulls one of the doors open and steps into the front hall. Linoleum floors. Trophy cases. Metal lockers. Noise and laughter and chaos and all the urgency that is about being 14 years old.

Sam’s friends disappear into the crowd, and he stands alone in the midst of the milling mob. An adult hollers instructions, and the students form a rough line that engulfs Sam where he stands. His friends pay no attention to him as they move up and down the line to talk with buddies they have not seen in months.

The line snakes toward the cafeteria, where the students will get their schedules and receive their student identification cards.

Parents show up to pay fees. More students arrive and join the line. The crowd clogs the hall, and someone announces that it will be hours before everyone is registered. Adult volunteers herd the students along, shouting instructions. A teacher brings out a fan to keep everyone cool.

Sam watches new students arrive and walk past him toward the end of the line. He turns to his left, toward a bank of lockers. From this angle, no one can see the left side of his face. Even the students who stand next to him seem unaware of his presence.

“Hey there.”

Sam turns. A Grant administrator motions to him and then walks over.

“How you doing?” he asks as he sticks out his hand.

“Fine,” says Sam, shaking hands while wondering who this man could possibly be.

The man raises his hand, starts to gesture toward Sam’s face, then thinks better of it and lets his hand drop to his side.

“Say, you don’t have to wait here in line,” he says. “I mean …”

The words hang in the air.

“Let me take you down the back way,” he says, rattling a set of keys. “I can get you in and out of here in a couple minutes. Otherwise, you’re going to be here for a couple hours. No reason you should have to wait out here in front of everyone. I know how you must be feeling right now.”

The man steps closer, putting his arm around Sam’s shoulder.

“Let’s go,” he said. “You don’t need this.”

Sam weighs his options and makes a quick response that will be colored, as such things are, by everything that has come before. The years of living with his deformity. The decision to risk a life-threatening surgery. The choices he has made—to take a great chance and to confront life head on. “I am Sam,” read the Dr. Seuss line the nurse posted over his isolette when he was born. “Sam I am.”

He wriggles out from under the man’s arm.

“No,” he says.

“What?”

“I’ll wait with the rest of the students,“ Sam says.

“But you don’t have to.”

“I’ll wait,” Sam says firmly. “This is where I belong.”

*   *   *

On the first day of school, Sam got to Grant High a few minutes early and navigated to the room listed as his first-period history class. When he arrived, no one else was there and the door was locked—his schedule had the wrong room number.

The line moves, and Sam watches the administrator walk away. There is no turning back. Sam is carried, step by shuffling step, toward the cafeteria. He descends a flight of steps, walks through a set of double metal doors and pauses, looking out at a sea of students.

Then the line carries him forward to the first of several registration stations along the cafeteria’s wall. Brian Doran, Sam’s friend from Gregory Heights, spots him in line, hurries over and hands him a green piece of paper with a locker number and combination on it. Brian, who arrived earlier, has already claimed the locker and requested Sam as a partner.

Sam feels someone touch his shoulder and turns to face Molly Paterno, an old friend from his neighborhood.

“I was thinking about you all summer, Sam,” she says. “I wondered if you had the surgery.”

She studies him.

“Oh, Sam,” she says. “You look great.”

Sam moves more easily as the line works its way from station to station. He studies his schedule.

“Sam?”

Emilie Bushlen bustles up and leans close.

“Sam, can I see your schedule?”

He hands her his slip of paper.

“Sam,” she squeals. “We got word-processing together.”

He blushes.

The line moves forward. The next stop is for yearbook pictures. Sam looks at the order form, trying to figure out what picture package to order. He selects Package E, the one that will give him two extra prints. One will go to Dr. John Mulliken, the lead surgeon in Boston.

The other has a place waiting for it on Dr. Jennifer Marler’s wall.

He hands the form to the photographer, who tells him where to sit and how to pose. “OK, kiddo,” the photographer says. “Here we go.”

He lifts the camera.

Sam Lightner looks straight ahead. This is for the yearbook. This is for history.

He smiles. Broadly.

And a brilliant flash illuminates his face. (The End)

是谁扼杀了卓越?

美国教育史大致可分为三个不同时期,每个时期都代表着一种特殊而强大的世界观。第一个时期从殖民时代到 19 世纪 40 年代,加尔文主义伦理占主导地位: 上帝无所不能的主权是人类生存的核心现实。在加尔文主义的计划中,人的生活目的是荣耀上帝,而获得《圣经》素养被认为是教育最重要的精神和道德功能。学习拉丁语、希腊语和希伯来语是因为它们是《圣经》和神学文学的原始语言。因此,这一时期美国教育的特点是识字水平非常高。

第二个时期从 19 世纪 40 年代一直持续到第一次世界大战前后,反映了黑格尔的思想。G.F.黑格尔的国家主义理想主义哲学像一种恶性精神疾病一样传遍了整个西方世界,摧毁了加尔文主义。在这种泛神论的计划中,生活的目的是为了美化人类,以及美化人类行使集体权力的工具–国家。黑格尔推翻了《旧约全书》中的耶和华和《新约全书》中的基督,提出了一种泛神论的宇宙观,认为万物都是无形的 “上帝”,都在通过一种动态的、无休止的斗争(即辩证法)完善自身。然而,即使在黑格尔时期,识字率也很高,因为黑格尔强调智力发展,他认为人的思想是上帝在宇宙中的最高体现。人们学习拉丁语和希腊语,因为它们是异教经典的语言。

在这一黑格尔时期,公立学校运动发展起来,提倡一种世俗的教育形式,逐渐将《圣经》从美国的课堂上清除出去。纪律、守时、高学术标准和成绩是公立学校的标志。

第三个时期,从第一次世界大战至今,我称之为 “进步时期”。它的出现主要是由于德国莱比锡大学威廉-冯特(Wilhelm Wundt)的实验实验室发展出了新的行为心理学。在翁德门下学习的主要美国人–詹姆斯-麦肯-卡特尔、G-斯坦利-霍尔、查尔斯-H-贾德和詹姆斯-厄尔-罗素回到美国后,对美国教育进行了革命性的改革。

在这一计划中,人类生活的目的是否定和拒绝超自然,并为集体(通常被称为 “人类”)牺牲自己。科学和进化论取代宗教成为信仰的焦点,辩证唯物主义取代黑格尔的辩证唯心主义,成为人类道德进步的过程。事实上,”进步 “一词就来源于这种辩证的进步观。

斯坦利-霍尔(G. Stanley Hall)率先踏上了通往莱比锡冯特实验室的道路。1868-70 年间,霍尔曾在德国学习,回国后他对新英格兰清教徒的传统充满仇恨。他在自传中写道

我相当厌恶和憎恨我所看到的一切,以至于我现在比以往任何时候都更清楚地认识到,如果我流落到某个,也许几乎是任何一个激进派阵营中,并与当时的计划公开决裂,那么我是多么有可能被视为危险分子,至少对于任何以安全第一为座右铭的学术生涯来说是如此。由于这是唯一的出路,而回到农场又是可怕的选择,所以最幸运的是,这些被深深激起的反抗本能从未公开表达过,我的异端邪说和社会主义倾向也不为人知。

霍尔于 1878 年结束了他的 “翁特 “经历,并于 1882 年在约翰斯-霍普金斯大学创建了美国第一个心理学实验室。霍尔的两个学生是詹姆斯-麦肯-卡特尔和约翰-杜威。卡泰尔于 1884 年前往莱比锡,在那里师从冯特教授两年。他回到美国后,于 1887 年在宾夕法尼亚大学创建了世界上第一个心理学系。

关于卡泰尔生平的传记中写道

卡泰尔在巴尔的摩、德国和英国的学生时代–这是他在心理学领域最具独创性和生产力的时期–内心充满了抱怨。卡泰尔只在他的私人日记中倾诉了他反复出现的抑郁情绪、他对致幻药物的频繁需求,以及他作为一个 “怀疑论者和神秘主义者 “的基本哲学立场。

早在 19 世纪 80 年代,心理学学生就开始使用致幻药物,这难道不有趣吗?1891 年,卡特尔建立了哥伦比亚大学心理学系。在哥伦比亚大学的几年里,卡泰尔培养的美国心理学会未来成员比其他任何机构都要多。事实上,卡特尔是美国心理学会和《心理学评论》的创始人之一。在他的领导下,哥伦比亚大学心理学成为研究和教学实力最强的院系之一。

毫无疑问,卡泰尔最著名的学生是爱德华-桑代克(Edward L. Thorndike),他曾在哈佛大学师从威廉-詹姆斯(William James)获得硕士学位,并在那里进行过动物学习实验。在卡泰尔的指导下,桑代克继续进行他的实验,这些实验对美国教育产生了毁灭性的影响。

桑代克将心理学简化为对可观察、可测量的人类行为的研究,而忽略了思想和灵魂的复杂性和神秘性。桑代克在总结自己的学习理论时写道:”用一个驯兽师华而不实的话来说,对儿童最好的方法可能往往是’安排好与把戏有关的一切,使动物在其本性法则的迫使下表演这个把戏'”。

1904 年,卡特尔邀请他的老朋友约翰-杜威加入哥伦比亚大学的教师队伍。杜威从约翰-霍普金斯大学毕业后,并没有像卡特尔等人一样去莱比锡。相反,他在密歇根大学教授哲学约九年。他离开约翰-霍普金斯大学时是黑格尔的唯心主义者,但在密歇根大学却成了唯物主义者。1894 年,他成为芝加哥大学哲学和教育学教授,并在那里创建了著名的实验学校。

学校的目的是研究需要什么样的课程来培养社会主义者而不是资本家,培养集体主义者而不是个人主义者。杜威与其他新心理学的追随者一样,坚信社会主义是未来的潮流,个人主义已经过时。但是,只要美国儿童在学校接受的教育还在,个人主义制度就不会自行消亡。杜威认为,”……教育是在有利条件下的成长;学校是科学地调节这些条件的地方”。

换句话说,如果我们将心理学应用于教育,而我们现在已经这样做了五十多年,那么理想的教室就是一个心理实验室,里面的学生就是实验动物。

杜威与哥伦比亚大学的卡特尔和桑代克一起,组成了致命的三人组,他们简直就是要消灭传统教育,扼杀美国的学术成就。这不是一朝一夕就能完成的,因为必须培养一大批新教师和新校长,还有一大批老教师和老校长必须退休或去世。

到 1908 年,三人已经出版了三本对进步运动至关重要的书籍。桑代克于 1898 年出版了《动物智能》;杜威于 1899 年出版了《学校与社会》;1908 年,卡特尔通过一位名叫埃德蒙-伯克-休伊的代理人出版了《阅读心理学与教育学》。

杜威为这场运动提供了社会哲学,桑代克提供了教学理论和技巧,而卡特尔则提供了组织能量。无论是他们的弟子还是同事,都有一种在科学、进化论、人文主义和行为主义的基础上重建美国教育的传教热情。但正是杜威指出,高识字率是传统教育的罪魁祸首,是个人主义背后的支撑力量。他在 1898 年写道

我的主张是,社会、工业和知识条件已经发生了翻天覆地的变化,现在是彻底检查小学教学中对语言学习的重视程度的时候了……。

在我看来,由于对文学的高度重视而要求在早期学校生活中以学习阅读为主的主张是一种歪曲。

但是,为了改革教育体制,我们必须从另一个角度来看待思维。杜威写道

遗传的观念使人们熟悉了这样一种观念,即个人的装备,无论是精神上的还是身体上的,都是从种族中继承下来的:个人从过去继承下来的资本,由他为未来托管。进化论的思想使人们熟悉了这样一个概念:不能把心智看作是个人的、垄断性的财产,它代表了人类的努力和思想的结晶。

在杜威看来,我们身份中最私人的部分–心灵,实际上根本不是个人的财产,而是人类的财产,而人类只是集体或国家的委婉说法。这一概念正是奥威尔梦魇的核心所在,而同样的概念正是我们的进步-人本主义-行为主义教育体系的基础。

杜威意识到,这种激进的改革并不完全是美国人民想要的。所以他写道

变革必须循序渐进。如果不适当地强迫改革,就会导致激烈的反应,从而影响改革的最终成功。

要进行的改革中最重要的是改变教儿童阅读的方式。杜威和他的同事们已经规定,要大大降低识字技能的重要性,以培养社交技能为主,因此需要一种新的教学方法,刻意降低识字技能的重要性。

传统的学校采用拼音或音标教学法。也就是说,首先教孩子们字母表,然后教他们字母代表的读音,在很短的时间内,他们就能独立阅读了。新方法–“看-说 “或 “单词法”–教孩子们像阅读中文或埃及象形文字一样阅读英语。

这种新方法是 19 世纪 30 年代由著名的聋哑人教师托马斯-H-加劳德特牧师发明的。由于聋哑人没有口语的概念,他们无法学习音标或声音符号系统的阅读方法。相反,他们被教导用纯粹的视觉方法来阅读,包括将图片与整个单词并列在一起。因此,整个单词被视为代表一种思想或图像,而不是语言的声音。文字本身被视为一幅小图,很像中国的表意文字。加劳德特认为,这种方法可以适用于普通儿童,他就这一概念写了一本小册子。

1837 年,波士顿小学委员会决定采用这本启蒙读物。到了 1844 年,效果非常糟糕,波士顿的一群校长发表了一篇抨击全词教学法的文章,于是全词教学法被赶出了学校。但在新的州立普通学校中,”看-说 “教学法仍被作为字母-音标教学法的合法替代方法保留了下来。

当进步人士决定恢复 “看-说 “教学法时,他们意识到有必要编写一本权威性的书籍,使这种教学法获得新心理学的认可。在 Wundt 的实验室里,Cattell 观察到成人阅读整个单词的速度和阅读单个字母的速度一样快。由此,他得出结论,只要给孩子看单词,告诉他单词的意思,就能教会他阅读。

出于某种原因,卡特尔不想自己写一本书。于是,他让 G. 斯坦利-霍尔的学生埃德蒙-伯克-休伊写了一本书,论证 “看-说 “是阅读教学的最佳方法。这本名为《阅读心理学和教学法》的书于 1908 年出版。令人震惊的是,到 1908 年,卡特尔和他的同事们已经非常清楚地意识到,”看-说 “法培养出来的学生是不准确的。事实上,休伊主张把不准确作为一种美德!

尽管这本书的作者是一个在阅读教学方面毫无经验的默默无闻的学生,他也没有再写过任何关于这个问题的文章,而且人们对他几乎一无所知,但这本书还是立刻被进步人士奉为这方面的权威著作。

当一个国家的主要教育改革者开始支持文盲和不准确的阅读,并指责早期强调学习阅读是一种变态时,我们就可以预料到我们的教育过程会产生一些奇怪的结果。事实上,到了 20 世纪 50 年代,进步人士已经做得很好了,以至于鲁道夫-弗莱施在 1955 年写了一本名为《为什么约翰尼不会阅读》的书。为什么?弗莱施毫不讳言:

阅读教学–在全美国,在所有学校,在所有教科书中–是完全错误的,是与所有逻辑和常识背道而驰的。

这是怎么发生的呢?弗莱施解释道:

这是一个万无一失的系统。全国每一位小学教师都必须进入师范学院或教育学院学习;每一所师范学院都至少开设一门关于如何进行阅读教学的课程;每一门关于如何进行阅读教学的课程都以教科书为基础;每一本教科书都是由 “文字教学法 “的一位大祭司编写的。在过去,优秀教师不可能不遵循自己的常识和实践知识;如今,语音阅读教学法被挡在了学校门外,就像我们有一个独裁政权,有一个无所不能的教育部一样有效。

教育家们对弗莱施大发雷霆。他让他们显得愚蠢无能。他们知道自己并不愚蠢。他们完成了历史上最大的反智阴谋。虽然杜威、桑代克和卡特尔已经去世,但他们的弟子,哥伦比亚大学的阿瑟-盖茨(Arthur I. Gates)和芝加哥大学的威廉-斯科特-格雷(William Scott Gray)决心继承导师的事业。1955 年,阅读教授们组织了国际阅读协会,以维护 “看-说 “在小学阅读教学中的主导地位。如今,”看图说话 “以各种面目渗透到教育市场的各个角落,而且被广泛地、不加批判地接受,以至于教师或家长需要具备专业知识,才能分辨其中的好坏和利弊。

即使是最优秀的学生也会成为这种 “愚化 “过程的受害者。卡尔-夏皮罗(Karl Shapiro)是一位著名的诗人教授,教授创意写作长达 20 多年:

真正令人痛心的是,这一代人不会阅读,也不阅读。我指的是那些本应是我们最好大学的大学生。他们的文盲率令人吃惊……我们正在经历一场扫盲,据我所知,这在文学史上是绝无仅有的。

这种文盲现象绝非偶然。它不是无知或无能的结果。事实上,这是我们的进步人文主义-行为主义教育者故意制造出来的,对他们来说,社会议程远比任何与学术卓越相关的事情都重要。心理学家阿瑟-康姆斯(Arthur W. Combs)在 1975 年发表的一篇题为 “教育的人本主义目标 “的文章中,或许最能表达他们的心态。康姆斯博士写道

现代教育必须培养的不仅仅是具有认知技能的人。它必须培养出有人性的人……人性品质对我们的生活方式是绝对必要的–甚至比学习阅读更重要。我们可以忍受一个不善阅读的人,但一个偏执狂对每个人都是危险的。

当然,这里的推论是,你不可能同时拥有好读者和有人情味的人,必须牺牲一个来换取另一个。还要注意的是,这种非常微妙的暗示是,高识字率甚至可能产生偏执。如果这是人文主义者所相信的,那么我们怎么能指望他们去促进高识字率呢?

1935 年,杜威写道

寡头政治和反社会幽禁的最后阵地,就是延续这种纯粹个人主义的智力概念。

为了扼杀这种作为卓越之源的个人主义智力,杜威和他的行为主义同事们开始剥夺教育的思想、灵魂和素养。1930 年,本地出生的白人文盲率为 1.5。外国出生的白人文盲率为 9.9%,黑人文盲率为 16.3%。城市黑人的文盲率为 9.2%。

1935 年,对参加平民保护团(CCC)的人员进行了一项调查。在接受调查的 375,000 名男子中,有 7,369 人,即 1.9% 是文盲,也就是说,他们既不会读报纸,也不会写信。考虑到大多数加入 CCC 的男性都属于社会经济地位低下的群体,这个文盲率实在是太低了。

如今,城市黑人的文盲率大概在 40% 左右,而白人的文盲率估计在 7% 到 30% 之间。没有人真正知道确切的数字,包括教育部也猜测美国大约有 2300 万功能性文盲。

事实上,弗莱施博士在 1981 年又写了一本书,书名是《为什么约翰尼还是不识字》。他不无伤感地写道

二十五年前,我研究了美国的阅读教学方法,并警告说要防止教育灾难的发生。现在,灾难发生了。

目前,美国每个州的立法机构都在努力制定教育改革法案。其中没有一项涉及小学阅读教学的基本问题。问题在于,大多数有意进行改革的人都相信,绩效工资、延长上课时间、缩小班级规模、增加家庭作业、职业阶梯、能力测试、提高教师工资、义务教育幼儿园和更多学前教育设施,这些都会给我们带来卓越的成绩。但由于一个非常重要的原因,这些措施不会带来卓越。当今公共教育的学术实质是由行为心理学家控制的,他们不相信卓越。美国的课堂已经变成了心理实验室,而心理实验室的功能并不是学术卓越。

如果说教育是由有效的教师和愿意学习的学生之间的互动组成,那么在心理实验室里就不可能有这种互动,因为心理实验室里两者都没有。实验室里有培训师和受训者、控制者和被控制者、实验者和实验对象、治疗师和病人。课堂上应该进行的是教与学。心理实验室里进行的是刺激与反应、诊断与治疗。

很多人认为行为主义只是对行为的研究。但是,根据 B. F. 斯金纳的观点,行为主义是一种知识理论,在这种理论中,认知和思维仅仅被视为行为的形式。尽管心理学本应是对心理生命–心灵–的研究,但从桑代克开始,行为主义者将心灵的功能缩小到今天心灵不再是教育中的一个因素。行为目标是当今教师的目标。

是谁扼杀了卓越?行为心理学。为什么?因为它基于一个谎言:人是动物,没有思想和灵魂,可以像动物一样被教育。而这一概念基于一个更大的谎言:没有上帝,没有造物主。

因此,美国教育的未来取决于如何解决深刻的哲学问题。显然,统治行为主义者和反叛的原教旨主义者之间不可能达成妥协。只要进步的人本主义行为主义者控制着教育学和心理学研究生院、专业组织和期刊,以及制定课程、编写和出版教科书的过程,公共教育就几乎不可能取得卓越的学术成就。

承认公立学校是行为主义者的永久俘虏是明智之举,因为行为主义者似乎还控制着维持公立学校的公共和私人资金来源。它们似乎无法抵御追求卓越的压力。

越来越多的人认为,解决办法在于放弃政府教育,将我们的精力和资源转移到私营部门,从而扩大教育自由、机会和创业精神。美国人民想要更好的教育。他们应该能够获得更好的教育。但是,要做到这一点,他们就必须扫除教育工作者为实现卓越而设置的一切障碍。事实上,这就是问题所在–如何打破、克服或绕过阻碍卓越的障碍。

公立学校学生的外流表明,这种情况已经出现。但是,留在公立学校的数百万儿童正处于危险之中,他们有可能成为功能性文盲,成为未来的下层社会。我们能拯救他们吗?我们有这样做的知识。但我们有意愿吗?未来几年将给出答案。

https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/who-killed-excellence/

Samuel L. Blumenfeld is the author of six books on education: How to Start Your Own School and Why You Need One (1972), The New Illiterates (1973), How to Tutor (1973), Is Public Education Necessary? (1981), Alpha-Phonics: A Primer for Beginning Readers (1983), and NEA: Trojan Horse in American Education (1984). His writings have appeared frequently in major journals as well. He has taught in both public and private schools, including a private school for children with learning and behavioral problems.

人生應尋求冒險還是尋求安全?

乔丹-彼得森(Jordan Peterson)博士说,人们 “为冒险而生,而不是为安全而生”,如果你能讲述一个 “正确的 “冒险故事,它就会压倒 “安全故事的吸引力 “或享乐主义的满足感。

身兼临床心理学家和公共知识分子双重身份的彼得森博士在接受澳大利亚天空新闻台主持人安德鲁-博尔特(Andrew Bolt)的独家专访时,谈及了自己的看法。

“彼得森博士说:”我在世界各地巡回演讲和写作的目的之一,就是要告诉人们,我们应该以自由为代价来追求安全和保障的想法是一种幻觉。

彼得森博士说,”因为我认为,如果你过着诚实而富有成效的生活,除了你周围可能获得的东西之外,生活中不存在任何保障和安全。

“我认为,我们需要更加坦率地告诉人们,尤其是年轻人,生活中存在着世界末日的风险,而且这种风险一直存在,但正确的态度不是把自己藏在被窝里,畏缩不前,被任何可能让你情绪低落的小事情所触发。

“而是自愿鼓起勇气面对世界,并从中发现自己比想象的要强大得多”。

彼得森博士说,”我们为冒险而生,而不是为安全而生,如果你能讲述一个正确的冒险故事,那么它就会压倒安全故事或享乐主义满足故事的吸引力”。

https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/andrew-bolt/people-are-built-for-adventure-not-security-dr-jordan-peterson/video/0b995b5236002889bafbf19f556a5867

Why are men thinking about the Roman Empire? The bizarre phenomenon taking over social media has many confused

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/social-media/why-are-men-thinking-about-the-roman-empire-the-bizarre-phenomenon-taking-over-social-media-has-many-confused-c-11929509

In a bizarre trend sweeping social media, men claim that they think about the Roman Empire as often as once a week — leaving women baffled.

The trend seemingly originated early this month after one user posted to X — previously known as Twitter — sharing her husband’s response after asking him: “How often do you think about the Roman Empire?”.

To that, her husband responded without missing a beat: “Every day”.

After the Tweet started to gain traction across X, other women decided to test the theory, which prompted many videos on TikTok showing them asking their male partners the same question.

And, weirdly enough, the theory was quickly proven, as many men in the videos confidently announced they think about the days of Marcus Aurelius frequently, sometimes as much as once a week.

It’s clear the newly encountered phenomenon had many totally baffled as to how many male brains do, in fact, lead to Rome, with the TikTok hashtag #romanempire now reaching over 900 million views.

“I’m convinced they’re all just pulling a prank on us,” one user wrote.

“Mine said every time it rains,” another added.

One shocked commenter said: “This trend is rocking my whole world”.

“My husband said “it is a duty of a man to think about the Roman Empire” like wtf?” another user added.

But the jokes haven’t come without the queries, with many eager to get to the bottom of the Roman Empire thought process, figuring out why a government formed 2000 years ago consumes so many men’s hearts and minds.

Hannah Cornwell, a historian of the ancient world at Britain’s Birmingham University, theorized it could be because of the images conjured when Ancient Rome is mentioned — which is further imprinted by Hollywood blockbusters like Gladiator and Spartacus.

Cornwell told the Washington Post that “an image of the Roman legion, the imperial eagle and that sort of military aspect” are the first things that come to mind when thinking of the Roman Empire.

Delving into the psychology aspect a bit further, Dr Alicia Brown from Turning Tides Psychology suggests that another reason could be its association with “strength”.

According to Brown, historically and culturally, men are often aligned with ideals of power, and the Roman Empire epitomizes tales of strength, conquest, and grandeur.

Historical tales from that era evoke intrigue, particularly for those interested in understanding the origins of societal strength and resilience.

Despite it seeming like a gendered-influenced thought pattern, women have come out of the woodwork to counteract it, stating that thinking about the Roman Empire has more to do with personal fascination rather than having a “male brain”.

“Yes, straight men do spend an indescribable amount of time thinking about the Roman Empire — but so does everyone else who’s curious about the past and the lessons it offers about modern culture,” said Cecily Mauran on Mashable.

《一九八四》小說線上看(1)

第1節

四月間,天氣寒冷晴朗,鐘敲了十三下。溫斯頓史密斯為了要躲寒風,緊縮著脖子,很快地溜進了勝利大廈的玻璃門,不過動作不夠迅速,沒有能夠防止一陣沙土跟著他刮進了門。

門廳裡有一股熬白菜和舊地席的氣味。門廳的一頭,有一張彩色的招貼畫釘在牆上,在室內懸掛略為嫌大了一些。

畫的是一張很大的面孔,有一米多寬:這是一個大約四十五歲的男人的臉,留著濃密的黑鬍子,面部線條粗獷英俊。溫斯頓朝樓梯走去。用不著試電梯。即使最順利的時候,電梯也是很少開的,現在又是白天停電。這是為了籌備舉行仇恨周而實行節約。溫斯頓的住所在七層樓上,他三十九歲,右腳脖子上患靜脈曲張,因此爬得很慢,一路上休息了好幾次。每上一層樓,正對著電梯門的牆上就有那幅畫著很大臉龐的招貼畫凝視著。這是屬於這樣的一類畫,你不論走到哪裡,畫面中的眼光總是跟著你。下面的文字說明是:老大哥在看著你。

https://bailushuyuan.org/novel/traditional/chapters/25577