Psychologist Dr Lisa Doodson reveals why it’s OK not to love your stepchildren

Dr Lisa DoodsonDaily Mail

July 19, 2024 11:13AM

Stepmothers don’t have the best reputation — thanks in no small part to our wicked fairytale counterparts.

And when it comes to being a stepmum, there are no clear rules, very little advice and few good role models.

As a chartered psychologist, I became fascinated by stepfamily dynamics when I moved in with my now-husband, happily hoping to form a family with my two young children and his little boy.

I confess I was shocked to find my new role to be far more difficult than I imagined.

This inspired me to conduct research into the dynamics of blended families and to write a book, How To Be A Happy Stepmum, in a bid to share my observations and findings with other women in my position.

With nearly a third of British households now including stepchildren, we stepmums need all the advice and support we can get!

One concern that frequently crops up is navigating the tricky issue of bonding with your partner’s children.

Get that dynamic wrong and you could be in for a world of pain.

Follow my expert advice, however, and you’ll open the door to wonderfully fulfilling relationships with your partner’s children that will stand the test of time.

TAKING THINGS SLOWLY

Research shows it can take four to seven years for everyone to find their happy place in a blended family — and the children will usually be the last to come around.

You and your partner might have been absolutely sure of your decision to be together from the start, but children will often struggle to understand the feelings between you.

They might be grieving the perceived loss of their previous life or resent the new woman taking their beloved mother’s place. If you go rushing in expecting their full support from the off, you might be waiting a long time.

DON’T EXPECT TO LOVE THEM

It is a common myth that you will automatically love your stepchildren. It’s uncomfortable to admit, but sadly this isn’t the reality.

And don’t expect them to love you, either.

In fact, the best you can hope for is that they like you. Count those little marks of respect and appreciation (“hello” and “thank you”) as a small win.

As you build trust, feelings of mutual love will grow.

DON’T TRY TO BE A ‘SUPER STEP MUM’

If you go overboard with gifts, attention or Stepford Wife-style baking marathons, your efforts are unlikely to be rewarded.

Children expect adults to look after them and rarely show the gratitude step-parents expect.

This can be incredibly demoralising for you, and if you lose heart and stop making any effort at all the children can become very confused by your flip-flopping attentions.

Instead, dial down your efforts and your aspirations.

If the stepchildren are younger, think of yourself as an aunt or godmother figure. If they’re older and you don’t have any parenting experience, think of yourself (initially) as a friend to them.

The last thing any teenager wants is another parent, so try saying: “You have a mum and dad and you have me as well, as an extra person who cares about you.”

Find something to share

Aim to spend a little time with each child individually — just the two of you, without your partner. That might mean watching endless episodes of Dr Who together, taking a regular Saturday morning trip to a coffee shop or making a vegetable patch in the garden.

Creating a regular activity that links you with the child allows you both to gently bond and become at ease with each other.

Children will usually defer to their biological parent but if you are the only adult on hand during these sessions they are likely to be nicer to you, and your relationship should improve.

One bedtime for all

If you’re trying to blend your own children with your partner’s children you must sit down and agree on shared rules and boundaries (bedtimes, control of the TV remote, sitting at the table for meals etc).

There’s nothing more likely to breed resentment than the perception that some are being treated more favourably than others.

DON’T CRITICISE THEIR MOTHER

You might feel jealousy towards the children’s mother, resentful if she doesn’t recognise your involvement or even angry at her perceived failings, but keep all negative feelings to yourself (or between you and your partner).

Quizzing the children about their “other life” can create tension that can put any bond under strain.

They need to feel comfortable, not interrogated. Your job is to provide a safe space where you can grow your relationship with your partner and his children.

SPEND TIME APART

It is understandable to want to throw yourself into family life, but stepfamilies can be stressful to navigate. Try to build some time away to reset your batteries and give yourself back a sense of control.

Just being able to pop out to the gym, grab a coffee with a friend, or sit on your own to read or watch TV can help protect you from becoming overwhelmed.

Without a break, stress levels can mount, leading to resentment that could impact your ability to bond.

Credit: Pixabay (user Surprising_SnapShots)

As kids, we assume that our family is the standard, no matter how peculiar it is

It’s the opening line in Anna Karenina, isn’t it, the one about happy families being the same and unhappy ones being unhappy in their own way? Because it’s Tolstoy, and he presumably knew about such things, I’ll let it pass, though it occurs to me that what families are in their own way is weird. Perhaps happy or unhappy, but decidedly weird.

As kids, we assume that our family is the standard, for that’s what we see. After all, we end up talking the way they do, having their social and fiscal ideas, dealing with stress or drink or the law in pretty much the same way they do. So it’s but a little jump to thinking that such behaviour is normal, no matter how peculiar that behaviour might be.

We observe strangeness in other people and in their families. God knows, I saw a fair bit of it when I was a kid. But perhaps because we have so little experience of the world, we don’t register it as weirdness at the time and don’t come to that assessment until we’re older.

Part of the cast during my childhood were my mother’s three aunts, who lived together in a 12-room house not far from our farm. Aunt Trace was a widow, though I never learnt more about her husband than that he had been a pharmacist (this created endless room for speculation as to the cause of his death); Aunt Gert and Aunt Mad had never married. These three women lived in perfect harmony in the house, and by the time I was old enough to visit them they no longer worked – if, in fact, they ever had.

They played cards, specifically bridge. Their days were filled with cards, as were their evenings. They had a circle of women friends with whom they played.

Because they went to church on Sunday, they did not play bridge on Sunday, not unless the church had a bridge evening. And Gert cheated. My mother delighted in telling me about this, since Gert was a pillar of the church. Over the years, she had developed a language of dithering and hesitation that was as clear a signal to her partner as if she had laid her cards face up on the table. “Oh, I think I’ll just risk one heart.” “I wonder if I dare raise that bid to two clubs?”

Since I never played bridge, I can’t decode these messages; it was enough for us to know that she cheated. The stakes were perhaps, after four hours of play, a dollar. But she cheated. She also gave thousands of dollars to charity every year and was wonderfully generous with every member of a large and generally thankless family, but cheat she would.

She gave thousands of dollars to charity every year and was wonderfully generous with every member of a large and thankless family, but cheat she would.

I remember little things about Gert. She always put the flowers in the refrigerator at night so they would last longer; she telephoned and complained to the parents of any child who stepped on her grass; she always wore a hat when leaving the house.

Towards the end of her life, after Mad and Trace had died, she was left alone in the 12-room house and was eventually persuaded to sell it and move to a mere six rooms. She died soon thereafter and left, in the linen closet, the sheets and towels that had been part of her dowry. Beautiful, hand-embroidered linen and all unused. I still have six table napkins.

My brother, three years older than me, also inherited my mother’s chipper stance towards the world, as well as the almost total lack of ambition that has characterised our lives. And he has, to a remarkable degree, what the Italians would call the ability to arrangiarsi, to find a solution, to find a way to get around a problem, to land on his feet.

Nowhere is this better illustrated than in the story of the dirt. His last job, before he retired, was as manager of a complex of about 100 apartments. His job was to administer contracts and rent payments and to see that the buildings were sufficiently well cared for. At a certain point, the owners decided to convert the buildings to gas heating, and that meant the old oil-burning system had to be removed, as well as the storage tank that lay under one of the parking lots.

The demolition men came and took out the furnace, then dug up the tank and removed it. Whereupon arrived the inspectors from the Environmental Protection Agency, declaring that because the tank had sprung a leak sometime in the past and spilled oil into the earth, the dirt that had been piled up around it was both contaminated and sequestered and could not be removed save by paying a special haulage company to take it away.

My brother, long a resident of the town, knew a bit more than the average citizen about the connection between the inspectors and the haulage company because of his hunting buddies, some of whom belonged to an organisation that – hmm, how to express this delicately – worked at some variance to the law. (We’re in New Jersey, Italians, the building trade … get it?) And so he had some suspicions about the actual level of contamination in the dirt.

As fortune would have it, he was about to leave for two weeks’ vacation. And so, the night before he left, he called one of his hunting pals, who just happened to be in the business of supplying landfill to various building projects and just happened to be a member of that same organisation.

My brother explained that he was going to be away for some time and that his friend, whose name he never disclosed to me, was free to come in at any time during the next two weeks and pick up the dirt that surrounded the excavated hole where the tank had been. The only caveat was that the trucks had to be unmarked and had to come at night.

Two weeks later, tanned and fit, he and his wife returned from vacation. As he stepped out of the taxi that had brought them from the airport, he looked about, like a good custodian, at the buildings and grounds that were in his care. Shocked by what he saw, he slapped his hand to his forehead and exclaimed, “My God, they’ve stolen my dirt.” Whereupon he went inside and called the police to report the theft.

The same was to be found on my father’s side of the family, though the suggestion of strangeness was provided by legend rather than witnesses. There was his uncle Raoul, bilingual in Spanish and English, who always answered the phone in heavily accented English and, when he found himself asked for, responded that he was the butler but he would go and enquire “if Meester Leon was libre”.

My father’s Uncle Bill lived in a vast, sprawling mansion about 50 miles north of New York City and often disappeared for short or long periods of time to the various banana republics of South and Central America. The official story was that he was in the coffee trade, so why all those other stories about meeting various heads of state while surrounded by machine-gun-toting guards?

Uncle Bill was married to the painted woman of the family, Aunt Florence, who was not only divorced but Jewish and had married into a Spanish-Irish Catholic family. Further, they had lived together “in sin”, as one said then, before their union was sanctioned by the state, the clergy wanting no part of them.

In the face of these impediments, we were all more than willing to overlook the fact that she bore a frightening resemblance to a horse and was, to boot, significantly less intelligent than one. Her mantra, which she repeated openly whenever we visited, was that a woman must pretend to be stupid so that a man would marry her. My brother and I never saw evidence that she was pretending.

And yes, this comes to me now that I think about them: Henry. Henry was their Japanese cook, a sort of unseen presence who was said to be in the kitchen, though none of us ever laid eyes on him. It is part of family lore that Henry wrote in his will that he left his life savings to the United States. Because no will was found when he died and there was no living relative, he got his wish.

My father’s brother, my uncle, a man of stunning handsomeness in the photos we still have of him, was an officer in the merchant marine. He was rumoured, though neither my brother nor I can recall the source of this rumour, to have been a lover of Isadora Duncan, though I was surely too young to know who she was when I first heard this story.

Family memories, family mysteries.

这是《安娜-卡列尼娜》中的开场白吧,关于幸福的家庭千篇一律,不幸的家庭各有各的不幸?因为是托尔斯泰写的,而且他应该知道这些事情,所以我就不去想它了,不过我想到,家庭以自己的方式存在是很奇怪的。也许幸福,也许不幸,但绝对是怪异的。

小时候,我们认为自己的家庭就是标准,因为我们看到的就是这样。毕竟,我们最终会以他们的方式交谈,拥有他们的社交和理财观念,以与他们几乎相同的方式处理压力、酗酒或法律问题。因此,无论这种行为多么奇特,我们都会认为这种行为是正常的。

我们在其他人和他们的家庭中观察到奇怪的行为。天知道,我小时候也见过不少。但也许是因为我们对这个世界的体验太少,我们当时并没有把它当作怪事,直到我们长大后才会有这样的评价。

在我的童年时期,我母亲的三个姨妈是我童年生活的一部分,她们一起住在离我们农场不远的一栋有 12 个房间的房子里。特蕾丝姨妈是个寡妇,虽然我从未了解过她丈夫的更多情况,只知道他曾是一名药剂师(这为人们猜测他的死因提供了无尽的空间);格特姨妈和玛德姨妈从未结过婚。这三个女人在家里和睦相处,当我长大到可以去看望她们的时候,她们已经不再工作了–如果事实上她们曾经工作过的话。

她们打牌,尤其是桥牌。她们白天打牌,晚上也打牌。他们有一圈女性朋友,和她们一起打牌。

因为他们周日去教堂,所以周日不打桥牌,除非教堂有桥牌晚会。格特作弊了。因为格特是教会的顶梁柱,所以我母亲很乐意告诉我这些。多年来,她已经形成了一种犹豫不决的语言,就像她把牌正面朝上放在桌子上一样,向她的搭档发出了明确的信号。”哦,我想我就赌一颗红心吧” “不知道我敢不敢把出价提高到两张梅花?”

因为我从不打桥牌,所以无法解读这些信息;但我们知道她出老千就足够了。经过四个小时的比赛,赌注也许只有一美元。但她作弊了。她每年还向慈善机构捐献数千美元,对这个大家庭的每个成员都慷慨大方,但她还是会出老千。

她每年都向慈善机构捐出数千美元,对这个大家庭的每个成员都非常慷慨,但她也会作弊。

我还记得格特的一些小事。她总是在晚上把花放在冰箱里,这样花的花期会更长;如果有孩子踩坏了她的草坪,她会打电话向孩子的父母抱怨;她出门时总是戴着帽子。

在她生命的最后时刻,在麦德和索斯去世后,她独自一人留在这栋有 12 个房间的房子里,最终在别人的劝说下,她卖掉了房子,搬到了只有 6 个房间的地方。此后不久,她就去世了,并在亚麻壁橱里留下了作为嫁妆一部分的床单和毛巾。这些床单和毛巾都是手工刺绣的,非常漂亮,而且都没用过。我现在还保留着六条餐巾。

我的哥哥比我大三岁,他也继承了我母亲对世界的温和态度,以及我们生活中几乎完全没有野心的特点。而他在很大程度上拥有意大利人所说的 “arrangiarsi “能力,即找到解决办法、找到绕过问题的方法、站稳脚跟的能力。

泥土的故事最能说明这一点。他退休前的最后一份工作是担任一个拥有约 100 套公寓的综合大楼的经理。他的工作是管理合同和租金支付,并确保大楼得到充分的维护。到了某一时刻,业主决定将楼房改用天然气供暖,这就意味着必须拆除旧的燃油系统,以及其中一个停车场下面的储油罐。

拆迁人员来到现场,拆除了火炉,然后挖出储油罐并将其移走。这时,环境保护局的检查人员来了,他们宣布,由于储油罐在过去的某个时候发生过泄漏,油溢出到了地里,因此储油罐周围堆积的泥土既受到了污染,又被封存了起来,除非花钱请专门的运输公司运走,否则无法清除。

我的哥哥长期居住在这个小镇上,他比普通人更了解检查员和运输公司之间的关系,因为他有一些打猎的朋友,其中有些人属于一个组织–嗯,怎么说呢–这个组织的工作与法律有些出入。(我们在新泽西,意大利人,建筑行业……明白吗?)因此,他对泥土中的实际污染程度有所怀疑。

幸运的是,他马上就要去度两周的假了。于是,在他离开的前一天晚上,他给他的一个打猎的朋友打了个电话,这个朋友恰好从事为各种建筑项目提供垃圾填埋场的生意,而且恰好也是那个组织的成员。

我哥哥解释说,他要离开一段时间,他的朋友(他从未向我透露过他的名字)可以在接下来的两周内随时过来,把挖掘出来的土坑周围的泥土运走。唯一的注意事项是,卡车必须没有标志,而且必须在晚上来。

两周后,他和妻子度假归来,皮肤黝黑,体格健壮。当他走下把他们从机场接来的出租车时,他像一个好管理员一样,环顾了一下由他看管的建筑物和场地。他被眼前的景象震惊了,用手拍了拍额头,惊呼道:”天哪,他们偷了我的土。” 于是,他进屋报警。

同样的情况也发生在我父亲的家族中,尽管这种奇怪的暗示是由传说而不是目击者提供的。他的叔叔拉乌尔精通西班牙语和英语,总是用带着浓重口音的英语接听电话,当他发现有人找他时,就回答说他是管家,但他会去询问 “莱昂小姐是否有空”。

我父亲的比尔叔叔住在纽约市以北约 50 英里的一栋宽敞的大宅子里,经常或长或短地消失在南美洲和中美洲的各个香蕉共和国。官方说法是他从事咖啡贸易,那为什么还有其他关于他在持机关枪的卫兵包围下会见各国首脑的故事呢?

比尔叔叔娶了家里的油漆女弗洛伦斯婶婶,她不仅离过婚,还是犹太人,嫁到了一个西班牙-爱尔兰天主教家庭。此外,在他们的结合得到国家认可之前,他们就已经 “罪孽深重 “地生活在一起了,就像当时人们所说的那样,神职人员根本不想管他们。

面对这些障碍,我们都很愿意忽略一个事实,那就是她长得像一匹可怕的马,而且,她的智力明显不如一匹马。她的口头禅是:女人必须装傻,男人才会娶她。我和弟弟从未见过她装傻的证据。

是的,现在想起他们,我就想到了这一点: 亨利 亨利是他们家的日本厨子,据说他就在厨房里,虽然我们谁也没见过他。亨利在遗嘱中写道,他把毕生积蓄留给了美国,这是家族传说的一部分。因为他去世时没有找到遗嘱,也没有活着的亲人,所以他如愿以偿了。

我父亲的兄弟,也就是我的叔叔,在我们还保留着的他的照片中,他英俊潇洒,是商船队的一名军官。有传言说他是伊莎多拉-邓肯(Isadora Duncan)的情人,虽然我和我哥哥都不记得这个传言的来源,但我第一次听到这个故事时肯定还太小,不知道她是谁。

家族记忆,家族之谜。

Laura’s parenting style is ‘hands-off’ due to her strict, religious upbringing

Being raised under strict religious doctrine can have knock-on effects that impact all parts of life, particularly parenting, says Dr Cathy Kezelman, president of Blue Knot Foundation, an organisation that provides information and support to those suffering complex trauma. “When you’ve been raised within a controlled environment with very little freedom to make your own choices or realise that you can make choices,” she says, “it’s very difficult to develop the strong core sense of self necessary to provide your children with a secure base from which they can explore the world.”

According to Kezelman, healing begins by making sense of what has happened, how it affected you, learning self-compassion and re-evaluating your upbringing through parenting your own children. “Ways to achieve this can include counselling, self-care, meditation, yoga and art therapy. All can help to soothe the nervous system, build a sense of safety and trust and, as a parent, gradually enable your children to develop a sense of security and autonomy.”

Here, three women who have left their religion share their experiences.

“Parenting has been a healing experience”
Laura McConnell Conti, 43, was a fifth-generation member of a strict fundamentalist Christian sect. Because she suffers from complex post-traumatic stress disorder, the responsibility of parenting falls on her child’s father.

“From age 12, I helped to raise my siblings. I was the eldest girl and that was what was expected of me because of our religious community’s gendered beliefs. Daily, I had to prepare their clothes, get them ready for school, help them with their homework. On the weekends I had to ensure they attended church events wearing the right dresses and having their hair in the right style. Overall, I had to keep their behaviour in line with our religious beliefs and this left me exhausted.

Wanting something different for my life, I left the church at 19. Once I got an education and a well-paying job, I was able to afford therapy. Subsequently, I spent my late 20s and 30s recovering from complex trauma – a consequence of having to worry about and care for others when I was a child myself.

At first, I didn’t want to have children. I didn’t feel I was maternal like other women seem to be, or that I had the capacity to raise a child without it impacting my health.

Eventually, I met with someone who understood that the only way I could have a child was if he was the primary carer, and I had a son in my late 30s.

I didn’t think my life would change very much, but the reality is that parenting has been a healing experience for my own childhood trauma – although that was not the intention or the expectation.

My parenting style is hands-off. I don’t have the capacity to worry or organise for my son. Difficult things, like going to the doctor or getting vaccinations, I leave to his father. I get to do more of the fun stuff – clothes shopping, hanging out and playing.

When you leave a high-control group, you don’t have a template from which to mirror good parenting. You’re relearning to do things in a very different way and, as a result, I find parenting to be a lonely experience.

And due to the abuses I experienced, I’m hyper-vigilant. This means my son hears and learns about personal safety and consent at a much younger age than most. In turn, during periods when I’m not feeling well, he understands that I can’t be completely present in his life.

I aim to raise a well-rounded human being, who can identify safe people, has the ability to be confident in life and is surrounded by good friends, so he won’t need to fill his voids from such groups.”

“The backlash from the parish was shocking”
Mel Welch, 41, was born and raised under strict religious doctrine. When she left the church, she was overprotective of her children. She has since learnt that instilling self-trust is the best way to empower them.

“There were lots of rules and heavy control under the religious group I was raised in. The biggest fear instilled in me was of going to hell. It was deeply ingrained that if I upset anyone or did anything wrong, that would upset God and I would be banished to hell automatically. So I made sure not to upset the pastors or my parents.

I married a pastor’s son when I was 18 and he was 20. Marriage was the only way that being alone together would be allowed by the pastors.

Sadly, my first-born child died at birth. The backlash from the members of the parish was shocking: some said my baby’s death was because we didn’t pray enough. We were consequently given six weeks to get over our grief.

I went on to have four more children and by the time I turned 30, I could no longer keep up with the pressure I was putting on myself to attend weekly church gatherings and Sunday service. Feeling that no matter what I did I would never be enough, one Sunday afternoon in 2012 I sat opposite my husband and said, ‘I’m no longer attending church.’ My body felt nauseous from the anxiety of even hearing me say that and my husband turned white. That goes to show just how much power they had over our lives.

Consequently, I was shunned by the community. Gradually, my husband came to his own realisation and conclusion about the church and followed me six months later.

During this time, I continued to read the Bible on my own. The more I did, the more I started to listen to and trust my intuition about what the teachings meant. This is a new God, I realised. I slowly understood that I wasn’t going to die because I’d left the church. It was all a lie, so I started to wonder what else wasn’t true.

There was definitely a long transition period around figuring out how to raise my kids, because I was relearning so much and essentially becoming an adult myself. Until I was able to discern the lies from the truths, I became overprotective of them, a form of helicopter parenting, especially around any sort of religious ideas or strict ideals.

Over time, I realised that self-trust is necessary to thrive. I’ve taught my children to create a personal relationship with God through reading the Bible on their own, a relationship that’s based on self-awareness and confidence in their own instincts.”

“Marrying outside the church was frowned upon”
Susannah Birch, 37, was raised in a church that discouraged her from engaging in “worldly” activities. She is teaching her children how to be independent thinkers.

“One of the main teachings I was raised on is that Christians shouldn’t be ‘worldly’. This meant I wasn’t allowed to read mainstream books – by the time I was 12, I had actually read the Bible twice – watch popular movies or wear ostentatious jewellery or make-up. Sex before marriage was considered a sin. Further, being friends with or marrying anyone from outside the church group was severely frowned upon because they were considered to be ‘evil’.

My parents divorced when I was 13, by which time my family had distanced itself from the church. To my surprise, my father, who maintained more balanced religious beliefs, allowed me to do things considered worldly. I quickly discovered the Spice Girls and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and that began to change my whole world view. I also read different book genres and that made me question everything I had been taught growing up.

Subsequently, at age 20, I married a non-Christian. And when I had my two children, I intentionally introduced them early on to a wide range of fiction, music and movies so they could have a holistic view of the world.

Prior to becoming a parent, I thought I was over my indoctrination. Yet whenever my children did things the church would consider wrong or ‘sinful’, I was back in that world. I had to take conscious steps to prevent myself from imposing narrow ideas on my children. Today, whenever my children do something wrong, I try to explain to them why it’s wrong, as opposed to the punishments I received growing up, which I was never allowed to question.

My children attend a Catholic school, which I chose due to the quality of education it offers. It doesn’t bother me that they may be exposed to religious teachings, because at home we read and talk about multiple religions and philosophies, including paganism and Buddhism.

I’ve done my best to teach them to see different points of view and choose what they want to follow, after applying critical thinking. If they feel that something is true simply from emotions or peer pressure, I try to encourage them to question why and to think for themselves, not to be swayed by others’ opinions. I also want them to question the world around them and not to sit in self-criticism, as the church I grew up in taught me to do.”

蓝结基金会(Blue Knot Foundation)是一个为遭受复杂创伤的人提供信息和支持的组织,该基金会主席凯茜-凯泽尔曼(Cathy Kezelman)博士说,在严格的宗教教义下长大会产生连锁反应,影响生活的方方面面,尤其是养育子女。”她说:”当你在一个受控制的环境中长大,几乎没有自由做出自己的选择或意识到自己可以做出选择时,你就很难培养出必要的强烈的核心自我意识,从而为你的孩子提供一个可以探索世界的安全基础。

凯泽尔曼认为,治疗首先要了解发生了什么,它是如何影响你的,学会自我同情,并通过养育自己的孩子来重新评估你的成长经历。”实现这一目标的方法包括咨询、自我保健、冥想、瑜伽和艺术疗法。所有这些都可以帮助舒缓神经系统,建立安全感和信任感,作为父母,逐渐让孩子建立安全感和自主感。”

在这里,三位已经脱离宗教的女性分享了她们的经验。

“为人父母是一次治愈的经历
43 岁的劳拉-麦康奈尔-孔蒂是一个严格的原教旨主义基督教派的第五代成员。由于她患有复杂的创伤后应激障碍,养育孩子的责任就落在了孩子的父亲身上。

“从 12 岁开始,我就帮助抚养我的兄弟姐妹。我是长女,这也是我们宗教团体的性别信仰对我的期望。每天,我都要为他们准备衣服,让他们做好上学的准备,帮他们做作业。周末,我必须确保她们穿着合适的衣服、梳着合适的发型参加教会活动。总之,我必须让他们的行为符合我们的宗教信仰,这让我疲惫不堪。

为了追求不同的生活,我在 19 岁时离开了教会。当我接受教育并找到一份收入不错的工作后,我就有能力支付治疗费用了。随后,我在 20 多岁和 30 多岁时从复杂的心理创伤中恢复过来–这是我自己还是个孩子时不得不担心和照顾他人的后果。

起初,我并不想生孩子。我觉得自己不像其他女性那样具有母性,也不认为自己有能力抚养孩子而不影响自己的健康。

最后,我遇到了一个人,他理解我只有在他是主要照顾者的情况下才能要孩子,于是我在 30 多岁时有了一个儿子。

我本以为我的生活不会有太大的改变,但现实是,养育孩子治愈了我童年的创伤–尽管这并不是我的初衷或期望。

我的育儿方式是放手不管。我没有能力为儿子操心或安排事情。困难的事情,比如看医生或接种疫苗,我都交给他父亲去做。我可以做更多有趣的事情–买衣服、闲逛和玩耍。

当你离开一个高度控制的群体时,你就没有了一个可以借鉴的良好育儿模板。你要重新学习以一种截然不同的方式做事,因此,我觉得养育孩子是一种孤独的体验。

由于经历过虐待,我变得高度警惕。这意味着我的儿子在比大多数人更小的时候就听说并学会了个人安全和同意。反过来,在我不舒服的时候,他也明白我不可能完全参与他的生活。

我的目标是培养一个全面发展的人,他能识别安全的人,有能力对生活充满信心,身边有很多好朋友,这样他就不需要从这类群体中填补空缺了。”

“教区的反弹令人震惊”
41 岁的梅尔-韦尔奇是在严格的宗教教义下出生和长大的。离开教会后,她对孩子过度保护。从那时起,她明白了灌输自我信任是增强孩子能力的最好方法。

“在我成长的宗教团体中,有很多规则和严格的控制。灌输给我的最大恐惧就是下地狱。根深蒂固的观念是,如果我惹恼了任何人或做错了任何事,就会惹恼上帝,我就会被自动放逐到地狱。因此,我确保不惹牧师和父母生气。

我 18 岁时嫁给了一位牧师的儿子,当时他 20 岁。只有结婚,牧师们才会允许我们单独在一起。

不幸的是,我的第一个孩子在出生时就夭折了。教区成员的反弹令人震惊:有些人说我孩子的死是因为我们祈祷不够。因此,我们被给予六周的时间来走出悲痛。

我后来又生了四个孩子,到我 30 岁时,我再也无法承受每周参加教会聚会和主日礼拜给自己带来的压力。2012年的一个周日下午,我坐在丈夫对面说:”我不再去教堂了。听到我这么说,我的身体感到一阵恶心,而我的丈夫脸色煞白。这足以说明他们对我们的生活有多大的影响力。

因此,我受到了社区的排斥。渐渐地,我丈夫对教会有了自己的认识和结论,并在六个月后追随了我。

在此期间,我继续自己读圣经。读得越多,我就越开始倾听并相信自己对教义含义的直觉。我意识到,这是一个全新的上帝。我慢慢明白,我不会因为离开教会而死。这一切都是谎言,所以我开始思考还有什么不是真的。

在如何抚养孩子的问题上,我肯定经历了一段漫长的过渡期,因为我重新学习了很多东西,基本上自己也变成了一个成年人。在我能够辨别谎言和真相之前,我变得过度保护他们,这是一种 “直升机养育”,尤其是在任何宗教观念或严格的理想方面。

随着时间的推移,我意识到自我信任是茁壮成长的必要条件。我教孩子们通过自己阅读《圣经》与上帝建立个人关系,这种关系建立在自我意识和对自己直觉的自信之上。

“在教会外结婚是不被允许的”
37 岁的苏珊娜-伯奇(Susannah Birch)从小生活在一个不鼓励她参与 “世俗 “活动的教会。她正在教孩子们如何成为独立的思考者。

“我从小接受的主要教导之一就是基督徒不应该’世俗’。这意味着我不能阅读主流书籍(12 岁时,我实际上已经读了两遍《圣经》),不能看流行电影,也不能佩戴浮夸的首饰或化妆。婚前性行为被认为是一种罪过。此外,与教会以外的人做朋友或结婚都会受到严厉的指责,因为他们被认为是 “邪恶 “的。

我的父母在我 13 岁时离婚了,那时我的家庭已经远离了教会。令我惊讶的是,我的父亲在宗教信仰上比较平衡,他允许我做一些被认为是世俗的事情。我很快就发现了辣妹和吸血鬼猎人巴菲,这开始改变了我的整个世界观。我还阅读了不同类型的书籍,这让我对从小到大所受的一切教育产生了质疑。

随后,20 岁那年,我嫁给了一个非基督徒。有了两个孩子后,我有意让他们尽早接触各种小说、音乐和电影,让他们对世界有一个全面的认识。

在为人父母之前,我以为自己已经摆脱了被灌输的观念。然而,每当我的孩子们做了教会认为错误或 “有罪 “的事情时,我就又回到了那个世界。我不得不有意识地采取措施,防止自己把狭隘的想法强加给孩子。如今,每当我的孩子做错事时,我都会试着向他们解释为什么这样做是错的,而不是像我在成长过程中受到的惩罚那样,从不允许我提出质疑。

我的孩子们就读于一所天主教学校,我选择这所学校是因为它的教育质量。我并不担心他们会接触到宗教教义,因为在家里我们会阅读和谈论多种宗教和哲学,包括异教和佛教。

我尽我所能教他们看到不同的观点,并在运用批判性思维后选择他们想要遵循的观点。如果他们仅仅因为情绪或同伴的压力而认为某件事情是正确的,我会尽量鼓励他们质疑原因并自己思考,而不是被他人的观点所左右。我还希望他们质疑周围的世界,而不是像我成长的教会教导我的那样,坐在自我批判中”。

https://www.watoday.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/laura-s-parenting-style-is-hands-off-due-to-her-strict-religious-upbringing-20231101-p5egp2.html